US intelligence now says Iran halted nuclear program in 2003 - Will Bush take nuking Iran off the table?

Answer 1

No, he'll just choose to disbelieve the report:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/03/iran.nuclear/index.html

Answer 2

Reality check: nuking Iran was never on the table. Attacking it is another matter.

Edit: Perhaps the threat of military action by the US played a role in the decision to halt the weapons program. Or is that too hard to imagine?

Answer 3

No, he'll send some of his sycophant, do-me-boys to Dumdf*ckistan to get him some more fake documents stating that Iran is still trying to build The Bomb.

Answer 4

So now, Iran has backed away due to diplomatic pressure....never been a nuke ultimatum, but military options never leave the table in any administration.....but lets let the spin begin....

Answer 5

"we also assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is
keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons."

"We judge with high confidence that the halt lasted at least several years. (Because of
intelligence gaps discussed elsewhere in this Estimate, however, DOE and the NIC
assess with only moderate confidence that the halt to those activities represents a halt
to Iran's entire nuclear weapons program.)"

"We judge with moderate confidence that the
earliest possible date Iran would be technically
capable of producing enough highly enriched
uranium (HEU) for a weapon is late 2009."

"despite the continued halt in the nuclear weapons
program. Iran made significant progress in 2007 installing centrifuges at Natanz, but we
judge with moderate confidence it still faces significant technical problems operating
them."

"We continue to assess with low confidence that Iran probably has imported at least
some weapons-usable fissile material, but still judge with moderate-to-high confidence it
has not obtained enough for a nuclear weapon. We cannot rule out that Iran has acquired
from abroad—or will acquire in the future—a nuclear weapon or enough fissile material
for a weapon. Barring such acquisitions, if Iran wants to have nuclear weapons it would
need to produce sufficient amounts of fissile material indigenously"

Answer 6

No, the neo-cons need a boogey man of some kind or else the fear game doesn't work as well.

Answer 7

Not at all. He attacked Iraq when they were not a threat. His war of choices defy logic.

Answer 8

Nah......he'll just take out US intelligence.

Answer 9

Since they lied about Iraq how can we believe them now.

Bush will attack

Answer 10

It's not on the table and never has been.