Shold the government be able to frose ID chip on it's citezens. And be able to track them.
2007-12-03 06:35:16 · 13 answers · asked by whatshisname 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No. But the government will convince the parents the only way to keep their children safe is to implant a chip. They are starting with our pets, just to get us used to the idea.
2007-12-03 06:59:16 · answer #1 · answered by Cindy B 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What? Where do people get this stuff? It's not gonna happen. The ACLU some people hate so much would not allow a law of this nature to stand. And by the way, it's not gonna happen in 2008. What would the government to round up 10 -100 million people who refused? Halliburton couldn't build concentration camps fast enough.
2007-12-03 06:41:16 · answer #2 · answered by opinionator 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The chip one way or the different is merely a failure, I think of hackers switching identities for funds. earlier they locate the offender he's long gone. think of in being so, hackers can delete a chip, reprogram a chip, re-implant a chip. that's the main cutting-factor in stupidity. whether they might stress you to have this situation immediately, How deep is the hand that it ought to no longer be bumped off with a knife? For believers regardless of the undeniable fact that it remains a violation of their sacred physique , interior an identical way that a tattoo is. additionally if it expressly signify the Evil empire of the 2d earthly beast. As I even have mentioned earlier I also have a distinctive opinion correct to the mark of the beast and the beast. God is marking his followers on the brow in revelation. that signify your recommendations, your recommendations represents your spirit. So, so is likewise the mark of the beast, purely that his mark may be word interior the non secular physique, or interior the actual physique in character. that's merely evil doers stay on the right interior the top of situations. I have been given greater to debate in this concern and the chip yet this sort is merely too constrained. so if incredibly anybody might decide to talk or debate in this might freely write me. respectfully and intelligently.
2016-10-19 00:24:04 · answer #3 · answered by olmeda 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO definately not. We are entitled to privacy for f**k sake. We won't be able to go anywhere without the f**king government knowing where we are.
I reckon they should put them on prisoners, so when they get out they can be tracked just in case they commit more crimes and do a runner and try and hide.
This government is getting worse by the second.
2007-12-03 06:39:26 · answer #4 · answered by d4n2005 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If they tried that,they'd get an up close and personal introduction to real terrorism. You have no idea what it would be like seeing 293,000,000 people charging at you.
The only thing you can say is,"this aint going to be pretty".
2007-12-03 06:53:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is when people will start revolting and fascism will be more obvious. I can only think of one candidate that would not allow such abomination. Join the rEVOLution.
2007-12-03 06:43:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope so. Then at least someone will join the resistance movement. We are less then 100 members at the moment.
2007-12-03 06:51:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They can do what ever with the chips,As long as they leave my deep fried mars-bar alone!
2007-12-03 06:41:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
This would violate your constitutional rights.
2007-12-03 06:39:04 · answer #9 · answered by vlakieste 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
dont agree with i.d cards.it is just for money nothing else.
2007-12-03 06:38:22 · answer #10 · answered by steven e 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋