Let's face it there are factions or gruops and folks on both side that sacrifice and vote tha way. So I feel it is a real Ameican virtue.
2007-12-03 06:32:07 · 20 answers · asked by R J 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
yyyyyyeeeesssss. that was a sssstttttuuuuuddddderrrr.
But that will NOT happen in 2008! Our Republican candidates kick AZZ over the DemoRATS!
VOTE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE!
2007-12-03 08:06:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i'm too youthful to vote (i'm 14), just to make that sparkling, yet truly, i would not opt for the two. i think that each and every of the applicants have been corrupt, or insane (hi ron paul!). obama will win, however, i'm quite confident. bush hasn't accomplished something for the financial device, so why could they positioned yet another republican in? the entire issue with our device now's that there'll be a republican in place of work case in point, then a democrat would be voted in and attempt to undo each and every thing the republican party did, then yet another republican is voted in and tries to undo what the democrat did and rebuild each and every thing the republicans initially did, and then it rather is torn down lower back by the opposing party, and then it merely is going backward and forward, so no one gets something functional accomplished! until the political events can make certain something it rather is the ideal pastime for the comprehensive united states of america, we are able to have the country we've today, that's quite plenty terrible.
2016-10-10 04:02:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course... I would prefer a candidate with more conservative views, but I'd vote for someone who has a solid plan before I voted for someone in my party that was wish washy or just wrong.
I just want someone to do a good job... (my way preferably)
2007-12-03 08:08:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course! I am generally conservative, but do not ever vote a straight party line. In 2004, I voted for a democrat for House and a republican for Senate because I felt they were the best people for each job.
In college, I actually worked on the campaigns for my republican Congressman as well as one of my democratic Senators in the same election because they were the best people for the jobs.
2007-12-03 06:34:32 · answer #4 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
In this election the candidate on the other side IS better. I usually vote democrat, but seeing what they've given us to choose from, I'm voting republican in '08..not sure who yet, still learning what each candidate is about.
2007-12-03 15:02:09 · answer #5 · answered by romer151 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In a heartbeat. Straight party line voting is idiotic.
"Which is better for the Country" is what it should be about every time, not Party affiliation and blindered following.
2007-12-03 06:36:17 · answer #6 · answered by Trollbuster 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think if the candidate from my party was way too far (left or right) and the counter party candidate was closer to the center even if he or she was on a different side than myself then YES, I could.
2007-12-03 06:35:38 · answer #7 · answered by cowboysfan 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I will and I have in the past. I always vote the person, not he party.
I voted for the Democrat, when we lived in Republican Utah, since the GOP guy was awful. (The Dem lost and the state had hard economic times with their awful Gov.)
2007-12-03 06:41:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Possibly. However, if a better candidate does not have the support of a party that I consider better, then its hard for them to get anything done.
2007-12-03 06:35:00 · answer #9 · answered by matt 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I feel a candidate has to earn my vote, I dont hold any allegiance to any party or group that doesn't earn it on a per-election basis.
I don't understand why there is a straight party option on ballots.....why vote if its straight party?
2007-12-03 06:36:14 · answer #10 · answered by Phil M 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋