Do you think we need this law in the United States?

Question

a law that says that the United States shall not attack another country and invade it unless it is undeniably evident to virtually everyone that the country beign targeted for attack is an "imminent threat" to the United States...such as they have troops massiing at our borders, or have acutually bombed our cities, or that we know there is an actuall missile being prepped to be launched into our airspace, etc... In other words, the war should be so obviously justified that a poll of the american people will show that at least 80% of americans say they are in favor of it, and the government must present undeniable evidence why its necessary.....and if it turns out that the evidence was not correct, or was cherry picked to make the case for war, that the administration must immediately resign in force, and charged with the crime called "crime against the peace", and wasting tax payer money. In other words, they can start the war, if they want, but they better have been right, or else.

Answer 1

No, but thanks for asking.

Answer 2

We already have some laws like this let me get you just one. Here is one law under the Federal Code:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sec_50_00001701----000-.html

See the War Powers Resolution here:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode50/usc_sup_01_50_10_33.html

The Iraq War violating the War Powers Act: http://www.themoderntribune.net/iraq_war_violating_the_war_powers_act.htm


Keep in mind that INternational law has been broken because of the Iraq invasion. War Crimes, Genocide, Torture etc.
There are many more laws violated also. But let's take a look at what the Joint Resolution really said:

What the Joint Resolution on Iraq really said:
http://www.buzzflash.com/theangryliberal/04/08/tal04009.html

Answer 3

We tried to contact Virtually everyone. He was unavailable for comment. Guess we'll have to do it the old fashioned way and let our elected representatives handle that responsibility.

If there's a problem, the people have an opportunity to express themselves at the ballot box.

Answer 4

Under our Constitition, Congress has the power to declare war when the President requests it. It's this thing call the system of checks and balances.

Answer 5

No, because the public is usually terribly misinformed about government policy ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_Metals_Act ). In addition, the decision to go to war may be based on classified information that cannot be disclosed to the general public.

Answer 6

I basically desire not! i could opt for to think of that somewhat greater ideally, the entire of the Kindergarten Continent could have the modicum of undemanding sense to make those human beings seek for counselling for why they're terrified of the choice intercourse!

Answer 7

No. I think we just need to be much more careful about who we elect. A law such as you're proposing would remove the foreskin from the president.

Answer 8

Absolutely not.

Answer 9

No

Answer 10

No

Answer 11

no