2007-12-03 06:07:11 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Clinton’s strongest backing among women now comes from those aged 18 to 34 – and not from her own boomer cohort. It may be that more seasoned – and timeworn – women are simply writing Clinton off as unviable because she is female.
It would probably behoove Clinton’s strategists to find out why nearly half of our country doesn’t believe we’re ready for a female chief executive. We wouldn’t, after all, want ignoring their concerns to come to be known in 2009 as the “Hillary effect.
An alternate question to put to people who claim to be ready for a “qualified woman candidate” might be to ask whether they can think of a woman (candidate or not) who would be qualified to be president.
2007-12-03 06:21:45 · answer #1 · answered by Easy B Me II 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
First you will possibly might desire to understand what Dr. King dream replaced into. It purely starts off out saying that he needed human beings to be decide by using the content fabric of their character and not the colour of their pores and skin. He additionally talked approximately as for the top of poverty and the top of the conflict in Asia. We nevertheless have a conflict in Asia and poverty international extensive remains undesirable if no longer worse than the time of Dr. King. Even our President whilst asked the place Dr. King might stand on his administration mentioned that Dr King might probable be protesting it. i've got self assurance he may be ideal. look injustice has no longer died. If something that's been on a rampage for the final 8 years. Dr King replaced into no longer useful chief of a useful circulation. He replaced right into a casualty of an on going conflict. A conflict that's a lot from over.
2016-10-19 00:16:04 · answer #2 · answered by sooter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there were one running who'd be good for us, the people of the United States, there's no reason.
Unfortunately, the only woman running is Hilary, who is corporate-owned.
Whether a person carries their genitals inside or outside the body is irrelevant.
2007-12-03 10:11:33 · answer #3 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No reason generally, but I would prefer that Presidential power reside in a Magic 8-Ball than the current potential woman president.
2007-12-03 06:13:44 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I have no issues with a female president, but don't want another Clinton in the White House.
2007-12-03 06:14:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
There is no good reason why a woman can't be president. Do you know of any that might run?
2007-12-03 07:51:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
With a lady president who would run the country when she wasn`t in the mood and wanted to be left alone.
2007-12-03 06:19:00 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. Un-couth 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think a woman president is a great idea.... Just not Hillary Clinton. I'm against her 100%.
2007-12-03 06:16:34 · answer #8 · answered by Stefani 4 · 8⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, who said a woman couldn't run? Hilary Clinton does not have my vote, but that has nothing to do with her being a woman. If Condelezza Rice were to run, then I would vote for her in a minute.
2007-12-03 06:11:14 · answer #9 · answered by DAR76 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Gender shouldn't be the deciding factor. You're supposed to vote for the best person. Do not vote for Hillary just because of her gender.
2007-12-03 06:11:13 · answer #10 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋