What is the world's view of American Foreign Policy?

Question

My fellow Americans, people around the world; Bush Supporters and opponents: I propose to you this question; Do you support the current Foreign Policy or not and why? Since our participation in WW2, we have progressed towards a more liberal forign policy, helping other countries in need at the expense of our own. If we can assume (which many won't) our intentions are truly good, in liberating the oppresed from various regions of the world from Sudan to Iraq (in what they say is to make us safer), why do so many outside of US oppose our actions. What is the world's perspective to our interfernce in Iraq? 70% of Americans now oppose the war in Iraq, wh yhas this changed so much.

I just hope we can learn to talk to each other, respect each others views, and learn from one another so that our opinions are constantly changing as our views and understanding grows. Is it possible to have one conversation about this war that doesn't incite hatred? I doubt it, but encourage it. Thanks!

Answer 1

This Canadians view is it is the worst ever,Bush has set back the USA for decades.

Answer 2

The reason 70+% of the Americna people and most of the international community are against our "spread of good will", is that most people now know why we do what we do and it's not for the spread of human rights. If Saddam was such a tyrant, then why did we give him the green light when he really WAS in the midst of his reign of terror? Isn't it obvious that we didn't suddenly grow a conscience? Remeber this when Saddam was committing genocide against the Kurds YEARS ago?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDABe8AOuCQ

The world is on to us and the sweet, charitable, gullable American people are also finally waking up to the reality of our foreign policies.

Why is there an autocratic theocracy in Iran now? Why isn't there a democracy in that rich country? Our actions in 1953 in Iran is why. This was the turning point of our perverse foreign policy in the middle east and we're still paying for this mistake:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ajax

.

Answer 3

Uh, you are sorely mistaken that our foreign policy has tried to help people rather than to oppress and hurt them.

On nearly every continent we have put in power, or kept in power, oppressive butes who have kept their people in poverty, and turtured and murdered them.

We give money to the corrupt and greedy, not to actually help people. (Well, some of it goes to actually help people, but most of it does not.)

This is why we are increasing hated all over the world.

And now we both engage in torture and invade other countries for no real reason -- both of which are Crimes Against Humanity. We target civilians, and care nothing for how many people we murder or make homeless.

We put the Shah in power in Iran, and Pinnochet in Chile (assasinating the very popular rulers of each to do so). We supported the brutal and corrupt in Central and South America, Asia, the Phillipines, and elsewhere.

The intentions of the goverment were not good, but greed.

We are not liberators, we are oppressors.

The whole world tried to tell us not to invade Iraq, but the murderer in the Oval Office refused to listen. (They just brided and bullied others to make token contributions to LOOK like an international effort.)

Answer 4

70% of Americans now oppose the war in Iraq, wh yhas this changed so much.

It has changed only because of the LENGTH & MONEY spent on the conflict in Iraq.

Answer 5

inspite of alot of alternative comments right here relating to the invasion itself, or ideology, or all of that, your question itself raised different the significant factors of it. You reported "they could have even joined the axis" there have been talks completed over a protracted volume of time attempting to do merely that. The 'Non-aggression' %. you often pay attention approximately sounds extremely benign, yet what maximum do no longer understand is that Hitler replaced into actively attempting to deliver the Soviet Union into the Axis powers. the priority got here while they desperate to settle on spheres of effect in jap Europe. The negotiations have been very complicated, and in touch Hitler offering the Soviets maximum of what they needed, yet different the Soviet plans in touch stepping on feet of German allies (Romania, Bulgaria) and giving the Soviets strategic factors and components that the Germans merely did no longer think of replaced into nicely worth on a similar time as. each and every time Hitler met Stalin's demands, Stalin demanded something else, so Hitler finally reached the tip that the Soviets have been enjoying video games and doubtless merely procuring time for treachory of their very very own, so he desperate to recruit each and all the main worldwide places of jap Europe and furnish a loss of life blow to the Soviet Union to maintain the priority of complicated worldwide politics. commonly its portrayed as though Hitler betrayed Russia for the exciting of it, yet in fact Hitler replaced into very honest in his efforts to deliver Russia in to the fold, and the Russians have been too, however they denied this after the war (in basic terms using fact the autumn of the Soviet Union has alot of this become attainable) human beings talk relating to the politics of Nazism and Soviet communism, and that they did hate eachother politically, yet that wasn't the factor. in the time of negotiations, Hitler easily stop railing against the Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union stated Communist worldwide aspects to stop preaching against Hitler and the Nazis. Edit: many human beings right here talk Lebensraum and Operation Barborossa... those have been all suitable to the war, and the war goals, yet this is beside the factor. the clarification Hitler and buddies (Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia, Italy, Finland, etc.) attacked the Soviet Union had to do with failure in negotiations for Soviet club interior the Axis. All of this different stuff got here as an consequence of the war, no longer a reason.

Answer 6

The lawless definately hate our policy