2007-12-03 05:14:46 · 23 answers · asked by 4knowreason 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
IT doesnt matter who is president. THey are all related. Dont believe these fake elections. Its like voting for 8 masks that all share the same face. They all have one agenda. world government, one world bank, and global control. 9/11 was just another step by our on government.
2007-12-03 05:16:50 · update #1
The yahoo question answer folks don't want to hear this stuff. They live in a fairy land where everything is nice and pretty and no one does evil. Well, you and I know the score and that is a start. Never give up telling people about this evil government that strangles us and tries to cram fake democracy down our throats. Their democracy is for the rich only and we can just go to hell. Good post and yes, the government planned 911 and they have another 911 to spring on us to get us into war with Iran! Spread the word!
2007-12-03 06:22:37 · answer #1 · answered by Richard Neva 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I guess not, but the flying and navigation skills of the al quida pilots were remarkable. They were all able to get first class training and showed amazing resolve to carry out their rather complex mission.
They were arguably more effective than the Japanese fleet with Admiral Yakomodo at the helm on the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
The sucessful attack on the Towers sat off a series of events Bin Laden could never dreamed of happening. Events that have cost the taxpayers and voters far more than the Twin Towers and 15 offices in the Pentagon.
I accept that it was a remarkable string of coincidences, but the invasion of the Middle East was no coincidence.
2007-12-03 05:52:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe it was an inside job.
While I may not believe every thing that Loose Change portrays, they themselves say not to - it's OK to ask questions, people. And while 9/11 may not exactly be an inside job as it is theorized to be, we all were definitely lied to about what exactly happened.
I love how uninformed idiots will write in trying to make YOU sound like the crazy one when atleast you have took the time to do your research and know what you are talking about.
Anyone with half a brain should watch Loose change and atleast take a look for yourself and see what you think, not just take Fox News' word for it. But when it comes down to it, people are naive and they want to hear what they want to hear - choosing to blind is pathetic.
Also, anyone who doubts the probability that 9/11 was an inside job needs to understand that jet fuel cannot burn through steel. Google it. Do your research before you try to act all knowledgable.
;]
2007-12-03 06:26:25 · answer #3 · answered by Kelsette 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No it wasn't an "inside job"
For example, every single expert on the face of the earth, who has published an article on 9/11, has rejected the so-called "science" of the conspiracy folks.
How can you argue with that?
===========================
Some other points are useful:
The fact that WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn’t hit by the planes is not surprising.
Even though they were NOT hit by the jets, numerous buildings over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers and were destroyed.
This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_attack#Damage
As for WTC 7:
According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7
WTC7 was only 400 feet from WTC1. Since WTC1 is over 1300 feet tall, as they pealed away, the large perimeter columns from WTC1 struck WTC7 & many other buildings with terrific force due to their high starting position. Archival photos shows perimeter columns lying on the ground up to WTC7. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
In addition, WTC7 was built straddling a Con-Edison substation. This meant that its walls had to carry a tremendous amount of force and were vulnerable to impact. In addition, WT7 contained numerous fuel tanks for generators, some holding 6000 gallons of fuel, & this contributed to its destruction.
=======================
Loose Change
The internet film “Loose Change” is a collection of falsehoods & distortions that tries to convince you that 9/11 was a conspiracy of the US gov't.
The film has been totally refuted.
To see an explanation of any claim in the film, go to the massive website called “Screw Loose Change” which is at
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
Note: The people who produced "loose change"have utterly no qualifications (in engineering or demolition). On the other hand, there are numerous publications in scientific journals that reject the nonsense made up on “loose change”
2007-12-03 07:46:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Sure and the torpedo bombers making runs on Battleship Row on 12/7 were actually from the Confederate Air Force and oh yes I did save my dixie dollars. Good night Irene.
2007-12-03 05:27:14 · answer #5 · answered by Mike S 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The American people are being lied to by fools like you!
You have not a single shred of evidence to support your prepostorous claim.
Vote for Rudy!
2007-12-03 07:29:18 · answer #6 · answered by Rick K 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Wanna buy some Enron stock?
2007-12-03 05:23:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
google "loose change"
That about sums it up. What really pisses me off is the undercover theft of all rights.
The Constitution seems to be so much ancient toilet paper these days...
2007-12-03 05:23:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Yeah.... global control, thats why we always give people thier countries back.
Moron.
2007-12-03 06:33:19 · answer #9 · answered by matt 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Your Mama was an inside job
2007-12-03 05:38:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋