Ron Paul has my vote. He is the only candidate that seems real. He is passionate about the issues and he is passionate about the Constitution. He will take us away from the socialism that Hillary seems to be all for and return us to our greatness - the greatness we had before we decided to become an empire.
Just a little thing for everyone for Huckabee, look at his record in Arkansas. He sucked as our governor. He always says that he lowered taxes more than he raised them. That is true, but the few times he raised taxes was way more than all the times he lowered taxes. The Constitution separates church and state, but Huckabee is totally honest when he says that his views on God supersede what the people want. That is scary to me.
We are not a Christian republic. We are a melting pot of religions.
2007-12-03 06:14:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Porkchop Jones 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
first of all do your examine to locate the party that "in actuality" represents your way of thinking. often, Republicans have self assurance in decrease taxes (even whether that's for the wealthy), much less government (regardless of the undeniable fact that it would be no longer elementary pressed to instruct it at the instant) and development united states of america by using being company friendly. Democrats often, have self assurance greater in person rights (now and lower back on the price of maximum individuals), taxing the companies and giving the breaks to the guy. Republicans are frequently greater conservative (professional existence, constitutional modification defining marriage), Democrats greater liberal (professional determination, gay rights, stem cellular examine) Being an smart person you will decide to look into applicants, no longer purely the known ones. And in case you have the time artwork to assist the only you think in. Get your supplies from greater beneficial than one venue. FOX information is amazingly professional Republican, ABC information slightly much less professional Democrat. yet take each little thing that's mentioned with a grain of salt, examine their balloting historic previous, no longer purely what they say. Their considerable purpose ideal now's to get helps, and financial backing to be the only to get the nomination from their party. enable's settle for it, regardless of the undeniable fact that Ralph Nader, Ross Perot and John Anderson can run as Independents out of the considerable circulation events, the proper threat for victory is with one in all the two considerable events. solid success which incorporate your determination and welcome to the circus!
2016-10-19 00:07:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
So far it is either Mike Huckabee or Fred Thompson. I'm pretty sure neither will be there in the general election, but I will then be voting for anyone other than these goofy democratic options.
2007-12-03 06:23:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Duke 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul
He is the only candidate who will follow the presidential oath.
Plus as stated above, Freedom & Liberty.
2007-12-03 05:28:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by vote_usa_first 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm not sure yet... all I know is that if Hilary Clinton is elected, she will run this country right into the ground.
2007-12-03 11:16:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
John McCain. He has the highest ratings in trustworthiness, the highest military experience, he is a moderate that can bring in indepents in and beat Hildabeast easily.
2007-12-03 05:42:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No one. The election is almost a year away.
2007-12-03 05:17:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul
Freedom and Liberty
2007-12-03 05:16:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by ducktown10 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Huckabee, he makes sense.
2007-12-03 06:24:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Clinton
I'm voting against the conservatives
and Obama looks way to young - maybe in eight years he will look old enough for the job.
2007-12-03 05:20:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋