What do you think of the fact that Repubs have to resort to quoting sources like the"Global Warming Heartland"

Question

and Youtube instead of actual scientific sources concerning global warming?

Here's one who did just that.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjbkkH8hnLY1GgU0nLpYC03Y7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071203095223AAalytc

I'm suprised he didn't also use junkscience.com, an amateur websites created by a CATO stooge. CATO is a conservative political think tank.

Answer 1

because this is literally all they have.

there have been exactly ZERO research papers published in peer review publications that don't support the simple fact that the millions of tons of co2 and other harmful chemicals emitted into the air are warming the climate.

scientifically trying to argue against the simple facts of global warming have all of the credibility and believability of a flat earth society argument.

remember that frequently those who actually believe this (and here i mean those not PAID to say what they say) are the same people who think that intelligent design should be taught in science class and that gravity is a 'theory.'

Answer 2

Some people prefer to live in the land of delusion rather than face facts. Of course, they have no knowledge or training to back up their assertions but why let that stop you or your ignorance? Hang on to it, baby!!!

Answer 3

So global warming is political is what you are saying. That's proof enough to me that it is not real, but rather a political topic.

Answer 4

Global Warming, as portrayed by Al Gore, is crap, plain and simple. Please don't confuse natural planetary cycles with a little manmade (and cow-made) gas!
Source: Thirty years as a professional environmental engineer

Answer 5

Wow another great question that is Definitely going to lend itself to the greater good of Society!!!