Is America capable of admitting what happened on 9/11? or is the pain just too much?

Question

I came to my own conclusions years ago, it put everything in perspective for me. Look at the link below and answer the question, then make a commitment to FIND the truth, if you are AMERICAN!!

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/04/military-leaders-question-911.html

Who here read the link? You folks bought the conspiracy, not I. My information is well researched, not spoon fed.

Answer 1

looking by the number of ad hominens and the same old crass and tired insults, it looks as though those who don't recognize a controlled demolition when they see one, are equally as inept when it comes to being original ( or at least as a general rule).

Answer 2

Now that dog don't hunt.

It all sounds good when you first hear it--That's IF you know nothing about how the military operates and you take statements out of context.

It's obvious you and the folks at that web site know little about policy, physics, and a lot of other things.

I AM an American. And I don't believe most of what I read on the web or bathroom walls. I've visited literally about a hundred web sites that are supposed to convince me 911 was an inside job. Guess what? Every one of them has convinced me of one thing. There are some who will believe anything, that the earth is flat, we didn't go to the moon, Democrats are totally honest, Republicans are totally corrupt and a host of other things. And I'm NOT one of those people.

Answer 3

I won't answer your question, as it is loaded and moot.

But, since you have done your "research",

Let's go a few.

Since all of the people you have made reference to have strong opinions, have they, or you, come up with a single person involved in any aspect of this "plot"?

Eve you, who has the answers, must agree that for a project such as this, hundreds of people must have been involved.

So, got any names?

I'll wait...

Answer 4

I was capable of admitting what happened on 9/11 on 9/12.
Terrorists flew planes into the WTC and Pentagon. People died that day. And if you had any respect for the fallen, you'd stop pushing that crap. If you really think the government had something to do with it, don't let the door hit you in the *** on the way out.

Answer 5

America will not admit it because it's not true.

Why should they believe a blog written by a nobody with no credentials when all the scientists with NO EXCEPTION have rejected the conspiracy "science"?

Here's what you should be reading:

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Also see the lead investigator of NIST explain the collapse at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse"

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

--FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

Answer 6

Are you capable of coming to terms with what happened on 9/11? I am sad that there are still people living in denial. How about the attacks in Madrid and in London? What about the massacre in Beslan? And the attempted attacks on Fort Dix and on Heathrow airport? What about the car bombings in Scotland? Are these all "false flag" operations as well?

Answer 7

This might be just me, but I tend not to take blogs as fact. Mainly because there's no verification process to which the author has to submit, such as with a periodical or a book, or a newspaper.

Come on, even Bill Maher disagrees with you, and he's managed to build a career around hating President Bush.

Answer 8

As much as I despise Bush and his cronies, I find it highly unliley that this was "an inside job." Am I certain we are partly responsible for what happened on 9/11 becuase of our foreign policy? Yes. You seem to shift this blame to a cover up, a pretext for an inevitable war. Likely as it might be, I still find it as BS. I do however, as stated before - think we caused this (the American foreign policy) and allowed this to happen because of blind ignorance.

Answer 9

It's easy. It has been 6+ years, Americans can't keep secrets, no one has come forward with any info that is different than what was originally said. Drop it.

Answer 10

I think that what really happened has been admitted many times. It was Islamic terrorists that caused 9/11. There is no conspiracy.