English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

seeing the earth can't even substain with the people on earth right now with the 6 billion for the next 40 years.

2007-12-03 03:18:24 · 6 answers · asked by sally sue 6 in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

i think breeding humans should finally start finding some other birth control device besides abortion..... abortion should be the very last step and not a first option.
same like, when i don't want to be around someone i go somewhere else, i don't just kill the person that i don't want to be around.
common sense should be first priority

2007-12-03 03:23:08 · answer #1 · answered by 21 5 · 5 1

If people used a bit of intelligence and used birth control,there wouldn't be any need for so many abortions,I accept accidents can happen,but there are a lot of abortions being used as birth control these days,theres no excuse,we even have a morning after pill which can be used up to 72 hours after the event...3 days,yet still some are killing babies.

2007-12-03 03:50:18 · answer #2 · answered by Pat R 6 · 0 1

Mass sterilization not abortion.

I think abortion is distasteful. But then I think all meat is distasteful. Ground up human meat is particularly so since I empathize with humans a bit more than I do with hamburger.

I think sex without a concern for the consequences (without responsibility) is wrong and such people should be fixed. We fix pets out of humanitarian reasons, I should think fixing people would even be stronger humanitarian reasons. Unwanted pets is sad enough, unwanted children is monumentally worse.

From a moral standpoint, euthanizing animals is worse than fixing them. After all, killing is worse than cutting off procreation (or am I wrong?).

Isn't it strange that we find euthanizing fetuses more acceptable than sterilizing irresponsible prospective parents?

We basically find killing more acceptable than fixing.

2007-12-03 18:26:41 · answer #3 · answered by http://www.wrightlawnv.com 4 · 0 1

I think it would be better to kill off all the criminals and dictators and con artists than the innocent children.
I sure wouldn't want the kind of people who want to destroy the helpless to be the dominant factor in running the world. How would the other species fare then? Somebody that doesn't even respect human life, will he ever respect non-human life?
BTW, the earth has plenty of resources. It is war and injustice that cause massive starvation, not lack of resources.

2007-12-03 03:30:22 · answer #4 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 4 1

Sure
And blond haired blue eyed
And Jews
And Irish
And the sick
And the elderly
and on and on and on it goes.
Murder is murder, no exceptions.

2007-12-03 03:38:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Abortion is a personal and private choice a woman should make without outside interference. 2D

2007-12-03 03:35:27 · answer #6 · answered by 2D 7 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers