In the US we jail people for smoking a weed that grows wild and does no one any harm at all except to make them peaceful!
2007-12-03 02:49:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
This is why we will never really have a good relationship with a truly Islamic nation. The vocal minority will always get the headlines and the majority of the west will only see the intolerant religious nuts as the ones who control those countries. Too bad, as Islam is an interesting religion and these people harm the majority who are moderate and understanding.
2007-12-03 02:50:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by WVAttorney 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I try to be "Politically Correct" and believe that all cultures are different but have value. I try to believe that all viewpoints should be respected, especially religious ones.
But this is simply wrong. It shows an inability to forgive a minor mistake. How could you raise children in such a culture? How can you welcome the stranger into your home, an act considered holy to Jews, Muslims, and Christians, and not understand that their culture is not your own?
I am starting to believe that there will never be peace in the Middle East when the dominant culture there does not respect differences or value the individual person.
I see the point that it is only a vocal minority that causes these problems. Please explain to me why the majority does not speak up?
2007-12-03 04:14:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by JJ 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes she was pardoned by the Sudanese president today. But it just goes to show you why their is so much unrest in Islamic dominated countries. Their governments are secular meaning their government ideologies are tied to their respective religion. In the middle east the "mullahs" rule the country not the government. So hence the insanity since its insane to expect mere "priests" to make sane decisions.
2007-12-03 02:48:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the concern is that those banks have indulged interior the liberal prepare of overcapitalizing -- borrowing upon what they do no longer very own. whilst the monetary device is powerful, they are able to break out with this and make a tremendous earnings in doing so, nonetheless they nevertheless harm their customers interior the approach. whilst the monetary device sours, they have an incredibly intense situation, very like what the Social protection administration, with its $fifty 9 TRILLION in IOUs, with which liberals replaced the actual money it as quickly as held, could now determine the thank you to determine.... sure, there's a answer. shop the liberals out of the monetary section. Letting those banks fail could certainly earnings the monetary device interior the long-term, because of the fact the marketplace could appropriate itself. the possibility in that's that a panic ought to consequence, draining all monetary institutions . . . nonetheless even that ought to nevertheless pass away the greater to blame institutions nevertheless status, as they do no longer look to be overcapitalized. i do no longer think of there are a number of banks that throughout the time of good shape this, however the credit unions are not overcapitalized. enable the tremendous banks die of their very own reasons, and our credit unions will %. up the depositors who're fleeing the plutocratic banking device.
2016-12-30 10:46:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by rogerson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wonder what the prophet Muhammad would have to say about it if he were alive today. I bet he wouldn't mind kids naming a teddy bear after him. He certainly wouldn't want the teacher going to jail over this. Why are people so insane?
2007-12-03 02:49:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Byakuya 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I agree with everything you say, but I can't understand why she would go to to Sudan in the first place, or any other Muslim country, they are all a bunch of nutters.Also why are the Western countries allowing so many of these muslims immigrate into their countries France, Britain, USA, Canada, talk about looking for trouble.
2007-12-03 02:53:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by niddlie diddle 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
About 80% of Sudanese Muslims disagreed with this. But a small, vocal religious minority pushed it through.
Sound familiar.
2007-12-03 02:45:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's sad is she didn't name it, the children did. I now question the motives of some of the kids. It's apparent that these people have no tolerance what so ever.
They act like a bunch of wild rabid animals.
2007-12-03 02:48:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
She should have done her homework better. She chose to live in a rough neighborhood without researching the neighborhood. Not the UK's responsibility to bail out every subject that makes bad choices on their personal overseas quests. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. If you can't handle that, don't even go to Rome.
2007-12-03 03:00:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by nileslad 6
·
1⤊
2⤋