On December 3, 2007 -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton volunteered to personally negotiate with suspect Leeland Eisenberg, 46, who took hostages at her Rochester headquarters on Friday.with what appeared to be a bomb strapped to his chest.
Q: Was this simply a dry run for the assassination of Hillary Clinton
2007-12-03 02:08:05 · 13 answers · asked by Denny B. 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. It was a case of a lone nutcase being a nutcase.
2007-12-03 02:10:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Hillary will loose steam as this is going on. that's the honeymoon area. as quickly as we get to the airborne dirt and airborne dirt and dirt tossing and mudslinging that's going to all replace. there is a lot airborne dirt and airborne dirt and dirt which would be presented whilst the time is right that any one for Hillary might might desire to be thoroughly ignorant or have the IQ of a malicious software!
2016-10-18 23:39:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are deranged people who, no matter who is running or elected, will try to threaten them. Most of the time we don't hear about it. I thought Senator Clinton handled the situation quite well. I am still not voting for her in the primaries but thought she did well just the same.
2007-12-03 02:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
People are trying to kill Bush every day, and any President for that matter. I'm sure Hillary will be in no more or no less jeopardy should she be elected.
We live in a nation that has many violent loonies running around in it.
2007-12-03 02:11:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think it was set up by her or her people as a publicity stunt for free press time. It's too convenient for it to happen right now but we can always hope it is a dry run.
Wanna bet she pardons him?
2007-12-03 02:53:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let me guess..the Bush administration is up to this or is it the RNC.
Here's my thought..it was done by Hillary to be able to get free air time to bring up mental health and more gun control.
2007-12-03 02:15:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I hate Hillary but I do not want to see her dead. Eisenberg in all likelyhood is a Clinton plant to dramatize her Hillary Care plan. He wanted fee mental health services.
2007-12-03 02:12:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
'Tis not prudent to speak of the death of a president or candidate
2007-12-03 02:13:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I hope not, because assassination solves nothing.
2007-12-03 02:15:11 · answer #9 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillery's assassin won't need a dry run. He'll get it done right the first time without a practice.
2007-12-03 02:12:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋