Why are liberals so sure that elections are fair when dictators and socialists win but think our own are not?

Question

Every recount in Florida by everyone showed Bush to win. You can not produce a single recount with any other out come.
Therefore you are willfully lying to say other wise.

Yes I admit Chavez won. I hope Venezuela does well and her people prosper. I just don't want them to lose their right to vote out anyone.

Answer 1

A few do, I don't.

By the way, can you admit Chavez won the 2006 election? If you can't accept reality, how exactly do you explain the fact that private foreign polling companies had him winning in 2006 with about 60% of the vote?

I admit Bush won in 2000 and 2004.

I can accept reality. Can you?

That is all I'm asking for. If you can accept Chavez losing this referendum, can you now accept the 2006 election and the fact that Chavez won?

Answer 2

We have to be more vigilant about our own election system because we have seen clear examples of how it can be manipulated. We have grown complacent about our own system and that complacency invites abuse. Saying that it is fine doesn’t make it so.

A conclusion about the 2000 election depends on which tally you look at for the 2000 election. If a statewide recount had been conducted, Gore would have won Florida’s electoral votes. As you know, Gore won the popular vote nationwide. There is absolutely no reason to concede that Bush won the 2000 election, because he didn’t.

Answer 3

You are WRONG. Gore won, no question about it.

"As the Miami Herald continues its audit of Florida's undervotes, and a prestigious media consortium examines the state's overvotes and undervotes, the DNC is keeping track of results from other media recounts across the state. And the news is good for Gore.
According to the certified Florida results, Bush won the state by 527 votes. But Backus says recounts by the Orlando Sentinel, Palm Beach Post and the Chicago Tribune Co. collectively show Gore picking up 1,617 votes, giving him a "winning" margin of 1,080 votes.
Last week, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Gore would have gained more than 200 extra votes if Orange County had conducted a hand recount of all its ballots that machines could not read. An earlier investigation of overvotes in Lake County showed a 300-vote pickup for Gore. "

http://archive.salon.com/politics/fix/2001/02/15/political_fix/index.html



“And there's one final complication: There are various possible answers to my question of who got more legally valid votes, depending on what standards of legality and validity you use. Should there have been a statewide standard for what counts as a legal vote, or a county-by-county standard? Are dangling and pregnant chad admissible? Survivors of the post-election recall these debates as so many bad dreams. But while in theory there could be multiple, contradictory answers to my question, in practice there turns out to be a single bottom line. Using eight different criteria for what constitutes a legally valid and countable vote, Gore probably would have won Florida by a hundred votes or so. Take out of the equation the 680 dubious absentee ballots that were wrongly counted, the preponderance of them presumably Bush votes, and Gore's margin widens to something slightly less negligible.”


http://www.slate.com/id/2058631/


“The Palm Beach Post's recount of undervotes--hanging, dimpled, pinhole chads--gave Al Gore 784 additional votes in Palm Beach County. If the same recount method were followed statewide, Gore would win ...”

http://articles.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb1367/is_200104/ai_n6386116

Answer 4

i do no longer think of Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton would be those. there is not any way human beings desire a 0.33 Bush and Clinton is getting an excellent type of warmth for letting some human beings die.. Dennis Kucinich or Joe Biden could be my wager on the democrat part. Rand Paul, Rick Santorum, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Jon Huntsman, Chris Christie could be my decision on the republican part.

Answer 5

Well when the person that comes up with the elections rules in a state is also the campaign manager for a certain person that is running in the Presidential race, we really have to look close. Also was she not the person that took people off the voting rolls?

Answer 6

We have controls in place to monitor elections, i.e. exit polls, that are extremely accurate.

No recount was ever completed in Florida. It was illegally stopped by the U.S. supreme court.

Answer 7

Dictator Bush "won". (Umm, yes, terrible use of that word.)
But liberals DON'T think it's fair.

Answer 8

Well, FL set the record for a close race, and, lets face it, it was decided by a conservat the supreme court. Having said that, Bush DID win the election, and, we have paid the price for this ever since.

Answer 9

what recount stacked court blocked it

Answer 10

It's only "not fair" if the elactions don't turn in their favor. There can be gross cheating, Ohio in 2004 for example, but as long as it benefits the libs........