So don't believe it, but will it hurt for you to pick up and recycle the can, or plan all your trips so you Don't throw hundred of pounds of pollution into the air? I mean really....WILL IT HURT???
2007-12-03 00:39:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
i do no longer comprehend the way automatically I have were given to furnish an reason for this. Scientists have concluded that global warming will advance the rigidity of hurricanes once they have were given formed, although does now no longer impression the frequency with which they style.
2016-10-25 08:54:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know how many times I have to explain this.
Scientists have concluded that global warming increases the strength of hurricanes once they've formed, but does not impact the frequency with which they form.
2007-12-03 04:28:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dana1981 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep, all that praying by jeebuz freaks in florida and the gulf coast kept the hurricanes from making landfall in the US.
Instead several of them destroyed islands and resort towns along the coastlines south of us.
Thanks for letting us know you are a f**king idiot, so that there is no ambiguity.
2007-12-03 00:38:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Oh, the short-sightedness.
But yes, the Democrats surely will continue making the climate and environment a political button. And this is horrible for them to do, because it forces right-wing people to essentially take an skeptical, even apathetic stance toward anything that has to do with environmental conservatism. Just by association. Really stupid of both sides.
Also, whoever told you that hurricanes were the one and only measure of climate change? Whoever it was is stupid, as are you for believing it.
(Unless you're just trolling)
2007-12-03 00:38:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Buying is Voting 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
I don't believe in global warming, I just take care of my environment for the heck of it! you probably should to!
But it would explain the exceptionally strange weather patterns in my areas, along with the odd insect lifecycles.
but hey, that is all circumstancial at best but the SMOG created by toxic emissions isn't, so how about we reduce them just for fun?
Since we have only one planet, are you willing to gamble it? Obviously so.
2007-12-03 00:42:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
haha - good one
That would explain why the UK had the wettest summer - why typhoons are up. Why the world had its warmest 8 years since records began in the last 10. etc. - why ice sheets are melting and glaciers receding -
But because the hurricanes were down GW is over - right?!
Strange things are afoot - IF the conveyor belt is slowing then weird weather across the world will follow.
2007-12-03 00:38:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wayne ahrRg 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Strange but true...There were exactly eight, but as luck would have it they didn't make landfall on the US coast. Lucky us. Selective information is what we used to call 'propaganda'....now we call it FOX 'NEWS'! No kiddin'!
2007-12-03 00:52:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I can only assume that your question is a tribute to the late Evel Knieval since the jump you made in logic is rivalled only by some that he made in life.
2007-12-03 00:46:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by jurydoc 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
The "scientific" consensus seems to be that both more hurricanes and fewer hurricanes are unassailable proof of man made global warning.
2007-12-03 00:44:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by nileslad 6
·
1⤊
3⤋