IS It any coincidence that Brit Spears stuck up for michale jackosn and nd now she acts just like him.?

Question

boht being perverts.
both being unsafe around children.
i just saw in STAR that she has a "secret " sex room double locked with a bunch of gross stuff in it. she is a mother and this is totally inappropte. i rmember when she stuck up for michale jackson even though he is an accused child molestor with peter pan sydrome. I belive they both were molested and have a lot in common. further more i think it was brit's dad. kinda crazy when you think about her frist video oops i did it again and they said SHE caem up with that herself. she was only like 15, can we say SEXUALLY ABUSED? then this recent development with her body gurd saying she was inappropate around the children adn the court took away her custody? um ??

Answer 1

I don't really follow the Brittany Spears thing- but I did look through that Star issue in line at the supermarket yesterday. The "toys" she had in her room were pretty tame: fuzzy handcuffs, a light paddle. It's not like she had a dungeon with a bed of nails. It was all locked up- and not where her kids could find them.

I'm not going to attempt to justify Michael Jackson's behavior... but I do agree with you that there are similarities:

both were super-stars with too much money and not enough guidance (their families weren't millionairs like Paris Hilton's... so they didn't grow up with guidance on how to deal with this attention and money).

both were heavily scrutinized... because the media thinks the public has a right to know (or wants to).

I think Brittany just wasn't mature enough- and didn't have enough support- to deal with the stress of being a parent when she had so many things competing for her attention (parties, drugs, ect). I feel really sorry for her.

Answer 2

in accordance with international regulation a sovereign united states of america can declare conflict on yet another sovereign united states of america each time they opt for and for any reason. they don't even could tell all and sundry previously they start up up attacking. So an act of conflict is in basic terms subjective. The U.N. is entirely a meeting place to attempt to stay removed from conflict, even though it would not have any authority over a sovereign geographical area. As for the question on the subject of if the Brits have been in Iran's territorial waters, it rather is obviously defined in international regulation. Is it plausible the Brits inadvertently crossed into Iran's territorial waters? confident, Is it probable they could lie approximately it? i don't see why, we did not lie approximately flying our undercover agent aircraft close to China whilst their incompetent pilot suddenly met it. became into it suitable as Bryan B pronounced for Iran to snatch 2 inflatable boats crammed with sailors armed with small hands a number of miles from their coast even if in the event that they have been technically of their territorial waters? NO! not often appears like an invasion tension. Do you think of our Coast guard could grab Russian sailors doing a nicely-publicized ongoing operation that spilled over into Alaska's territorial waters? NO. we could tell them of their mistake and tell them to go away. it rather is a thoroughly irrelevant overreaction. coincidence? probably this became into timed with a view to interupt Britains operation merely long adequate to smuggle something in or out of Iraq. The British operation isn't any doubt back on so that's now in ordinary terms for exciting, because of the fact idiots like BarB and BryanB could believe a propaganda assertion from our enemies previously their very own united states of america.

Answer 3

that's dad word