Clinton was acquitted does that mean he is innocent?

Answer 1

He was not removed from his presidency but he was disbarred.

Answer 2

Acquitted means insufficient evidence to prove guilt. An acquitted person could be innocent or not, but in the eyes of the law, he is not guilty. (Not guilty is not identical to innocent.)

Answer 3

It doesn't necessarily mean that he is innocent, but what it does mean is that in the Clinton Impeachment Trial, there were not enough votes to convict and remove him from office. Remember , you need 67 votes in the Senate to convict, since the Senate sits as a Jury in an impeachment inquiry. Evidently, The Senate felt that Clinton was not guilty or they would have voted for conviction. Clinton's impeachment , after all was a Right-wing cabal.

Answer 4

Clinton was acquitted & that means he was innocent

Clinton's impeachment , after all was a Right-wing cabal.

Go back in time , if the Democrats were a threat The Right-wingers would try to do them in.........

The man who is directly responsible for allowing Cambodia's killing fields to happen is the man who undermined its government by expanding the Vietnam War there, Richard Nixon. The man -- I'm being loose with the language here -- responsible for all the deaths in Iraq since March 18, 2003 is George W. Bush. There was no al-Qaeda presence before he went in. No one here likes Saddam Hussein, but he was keeping the real enemy, al-Qaeda, out of Iraq. Now they're in.

Liberals don't want to surrender. We want to take our troops out from where they're dying for nothing and send them where the real terrorists are, Afghanistan and Pakistan. You remember Osama bin Laden, don't you? The man who actually ordered the 9/11 hit? Iraq had nothing to do with that. Bush promised to get him, dead or alive. Well, where is he?
The name doesn't hold power. However, he is a perfect example of how to misuse the power he has been given to govern the US. He should have told the truth about his plans for Iraq in the beginning and then let the people decide what should or should not be done. I have not yet heard anything about any members of congress or the senate volunteering to leave their families behind to go fight in Iraq. If they believed in it so much, why didn't they lead the charge? President Kennedy directly challenged Castro that if he didn't back down he would lead his Navy against him.....People around the world had a lot of respect for America after 2nd world war........but that has changed.!!!!!!!!!!!

After 9/11 USA had a chance to right it's wrongs....but failed to do so ...it needed someone like JFK as leader.

I quote JFK " Lets not negotiate out of fear, but Lets not fear to negotiate "

Look what Right-wingers did to JFK & his brothers , sisters & son. Not one person or persons brought to justice over there assassination.


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...

Answer 5

Guilt is based on Proof. If there's not enough proof, then guilt is not established- & the person is Acquitted. And as LONG as that person isn't PROVEN Guilty, they are considerd Innocent by the Law. :)

Answer 6

What? Acquited of what? Clinton who?

Answer 7

Slick Willie, innocent? Ha! He lied to the nation, he lied to his vice president, he lied to his staff, he lied to Democrats and Republicans, and he lied under oath. That's called perjury. All of this WAS proven, yet he got off scott free by a vote of politicians, not a jury. At least he was disbarred from practicing law in his home state. If Slick Willie was innocent so was OJ.

PS Are we ready for another go-round with another Waffle House president?

Answer 8

He was declared innocent by legal technicalities. It does not mean that he is really innocent.

Answer 9

No, it just means he was not found guilty.

It doesn't mean it never happend, it just means it was not proven.