Clinton:
Pro Abortion
Pro Gay Marriage
Pro Big Government
Pro War
Pro Spending
Anti Gun
Giuliani:
Pro Abortion
Pro Gay Marriage
Pro Big Government
Pro War
Pro Spending
Anti Gun
Im starting to think this really IS as simple as, vote for a man, or a woman... What the heck is the difference between the two anyway?
2007-12-02 14:36:43 · 8 answers · asked by vote_usa_first 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I doubt (and hope for the sake of our progeny) either will be the nominee . Both are corrupt; but the mild difference is that Hillary is a radical left winger (comparable to Stalin) and Rudy is a moderate left winger (comparable to Putin). Both are autocratic in nature. Maybe they should run on the same ticket - they could arm wrestle to see who would be the President.
2007-12-02 15:27:31 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Giuliani would not truly have plenty to run on different than his 9/11 management and whilst human beings get the entire tale on that, it is not that staggering. Clinton won't be extraordinarily popular yet she is going to sound like a rocket scientist next to Giuliani... so I vote Clinton.
2016-10-10 03:02:18 · answer #2 · answered by trip 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually neither are pro gay marriage, but Clinton is pro civil unions, while Giuliani believes in very limited forms of domestic partnerships. Also, Clinton is strongly against the War in Iraq, and Clinton is far more pro-choice than Giuliani.
2007-12-02 15:01:28 · answer #3 · answered by Chris R 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It is funny that those extremists so far out on the right cannot see the difference between moderate right and moderate left are incapable of seeing it is they that have the problem.
2007-12-02 14:51:56 · answer #4 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Please get your facts straight.
Rudy is clearly not pro-abortion, he just doesn't think it's the government's job to legislate against it.
He is not pro gay marriage, he is anti gay marriage, but pro civil unions. It's not the same.
You have no evidence that he is pro big government or pro spending, beyond the fact that he is a politician.
And he's not pro-war, he's anti terrorism, but he believes we must finish what we started.
Finally, he is not anti-gun, he is pro-law. The gun control laws were there in New York before he became mayor. He simply enforced existing law. Imagine that!
Hillary, on the other hand, wants to be all things to all people, just like her husband. But her husband was able to fool enough of us to elected, and twice. She's no Slick Willie!
Vote for Rudy!
2007-12-02 15:05:56 · answer #5 · answered by Rick K 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Difference is essentially of his being Republican whose stocks are tumbling down .
Hillary was unwritten Queen and Empress of America. One New york can't make up for whole of America, with its diverse and multi - faceted cultures.
2007-12-02 14:57:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't like it either, but one is a socialist and the other a person who subscribes to the idea that the presidential powers should be expanded
2007-12-02 14:48:41 · answer #7 · answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
that is what it is i say clinton
2007-12-02 14:49:35 · answer #8 · answered by ¸.•*´`*♥ GODEZZ ♥*´`*•.¸ 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋