2007-12-02 14:04:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
This question makes no sense. It's as if a number of nouns that you think sound important were strung together randomly.
So, no.
2007-12-02 14:10:47 · answer #1 · answered by JeffT 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, the Universe is Given Time-Gravity by Bob the Insufferable.
2007-12-02 22:13:22 · answer #2 · answered by Ultraviolet Oasis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The universe does not need to be infinite in order to have gravity.
The universe does not need to be infinite in order to have time.
However, it would seem that the universe needs some mass/energy to have time; a totally empty universe -- one of the earliest models to be solved in Einstein's equations -- would have no time; It is just about the only type of universe without a cosmological factor (lambda) that would neither expand nor collapse).
no gravity = no time
---
However, I too suspect that Bob the Insufferable may have had something to do with it.
2007-12-02 22:21:51 · answer #3 · answered by Raymond 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I Think It's Cute The Way You Capitalize Every Word. It Does Not Make Sense, But It Looks Cute.
2007-12-02 22:23:00 · answer #4 · answered by morningfoxnorth 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
GRAVITY - a distortion of spacetime caused by the presence of mass
TIME - a human concept used to separate events
2007-12-02 22:12:42 · answer #5 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. We tried it that way once, but we couldn't get all the leaks plugged.
2007-12-02 22:55:53 · answer #6 · answered by aviophage 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont get what ur asking,
email me at
T_Q_O_F@yaoo.com
with a more detailed question, i think i get what ur talking about, but i could be wrong
2007-12-02 22:09:29 · answer #7 · answered by james R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
???
2 points!
2007-12-02 22:32:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
More specific please!
2007-12-02 22:10:02 · answer #9 · answered by bnyxis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋