Which Democratic candidates, do ya think, are endorsed by Al Qaeda?

Question

Al Qaeda used the Muslim train bombing terrorists in Spain (11-M) just prior to their national election to influence the election outcome in Al Qaeda's favor, giving Spanish marxist-socialist elements of the society a golden opportunity in the process.

Al Qaeda desperately wants to gain political power in Iraq, a self-described major battlefield against the West. An Islamist takeover in Iraq would be an ultimate victory for their cause.

Which Democratic POTUS candidates are in the best interest of Al Qaeda and other Islamist terrorist entitites, candidates that may be covertly endorsed and funded by Al Qaeda and Co.?

Al Qaeda wants, clearly, to gain control in Iraq and rid the area of the "evil" occupier.

AlQ and Co. are psychopathic suicidal criminals but probably realize that the "right" man or women in the Whitehouse will do the job for them! Not unlike what Jimmy "Peanuthead" Carter did in Iran for the Muslim extremists, a foreign policy blunder that we are still struggling against.

Bill Clinton has admitted that he should have done more against the Islamist terrorists, ie, he confesses to his major error in this national security issue.

Answer 1

Well a political takeover would be impossible for Al Qaeda to pull off with a troop withdrawal, as they are only tolerated in Iraq because they attack Americans. So the logical conclusion to your line of reasoning would be that Al Qaeda would want a Republican to win so that the war in Iraq can continue and Al Qaeda can gain a stronger foothold in Iraq and be in a better position to take over when the US eventually does pull out of the region. I'm going to say that Al Qaeda is probably rooting for Giuliani to win.

Answer 2

While Clinton was president those responsible for every terrorist attack were hunted down. Most of them are either dead or in jail today.
The exception was of course the 2000 bombing - just three months before Clinton left office. Why did Bush choose not to continue the excellent work of the Clinton administration (which he had to do with Congressional Republicans criticizing him for being more interested in defending America than answering puerile questions about his personal life in a politically motivated partisan investigation?
Why would AQ not endorse another neo-con Republican since Bush has publically admitted that they are not even trying to track down OBL?
You have it all backwards. By this administration's own admission AQ has become stronger while Bush has been in power, and yet he has no interest in catching thier leader. This administration is a terrorist's dream.

Answer 3

Rudy, Mitt, and John all sound like they would love to keep the war going in Iraq, which will boost Al Qaeda's numbers even more. The Democrats are starting to back off from the war, so probably Al Qaeda isn't too keen on any of them.

Answer 4

All of the candidates except one have been in government long before Al Qaeda was ever heard of. Does that mean anything to you? Even if your conspiracy theory were true, as long as they all follow the Constitution instead of doing things the George Bush way, it shouldn't end in an Islamic take over. No president should be given as much power as George Bush has been given. What you are considering is exactly the reason why. What makes you think the Republicans are exempt from this scenario?

Whoever brain washed some people into thinking the Democrats are friends of Al Qaeda should be locked up. Since you are into conspiracy theories, are these liars trying to over throw the government by creating a one party system? It makes me wonder sometimes.

Answer 5

George W Bush,Rudy Giuliani,and all the followers in the GOP.It has been PROVEN that Al Qaeda is safe with the Repubs in office,after all we are hunting down and smoking out Iraqis not Osama Bin Laden the mastermind of 9/11 and there wasn't any Al Qeada in Iraq till we sent troops there.SAUDI ARABIA AND AFGHANISTAN WERE THE ATTACKERS 9/11 WHEN WILL YOU SEE THE LIGHT.

Answer 6

that's on the subject of the main infantile,obvious game I even have ever seen. They counseled Kerry and Kerry lost. So now, they're utilising psychology on us and endorsing the different candidate so they are going to lose. Please tell me you will see that by this too. they are able to't Wait until ultimately Obama is in capacity.

Answer 7

Okay we know where your bias is you evangelical nut. Actually none of the candidates are funded by Al Queda. Then again Bin Laden's family is in bed with the Bush family which may explain why we haven't found Osama yet. Bin Laden probably would love to see Guiliani or someone like him elected since he does support torture or a complete evangelical nut who would further the myth that war on terror is a crusade against Islam since either would give him a reason to tell his fighters to keep up the jihad. Unlike republicans we would like to find a better way to fight the war on terror instead of just blaming Islamic extremists.

Answer 8

Hillary, Dodd, and Biden. They're all Washington insiders who'll continue the neocon war against peace.
They fear Obama the most of any candidate since he has stated that he'd go into NW Pakistan to wipe out Al Qaeda. That's a real man for ya.

Answer 9

Hillarudy Ghouliani

Answer 10

All of them. Having a Democrat in office equates to weakening our defense. What more could a terrorist hope for?