Apho's URGENT question on world over population.?

Question

sorry about the caps, its not 'that urgent, but I want your input.

see link...
http://edmontonkickboxing.com/map01

----------------------------------
so should we be creating problems? or solutions?
was the creator stingy? or is that the wrong word?

this is one of the things where when we dont 'look
we dont see (hidden on the nose..but not hiding)
how to say..

just an amazing fact methoughts :))
any others out there?

Answer 1

Of course that red dot grows a LOT bigger when you factor in land use needed for agriculture, housing, transportation, civilization's infrastructure, and the economy. Still, we're not quite an overpopulated planet just yet.

Most world population studies predict total world pop. topping out at around 9-11 billion in the middle to latter part of this century. After that, world population will stabilize and may even decrease somewhat.

Population growth typically follows an S-curve. For centuries the population will be small and slow-growing, then as medicine, agriculture, etc. take off, the population skyrockets. A bit later it levels off, due to several factors including broad and high education levels and a productive economy. Several western nations have already topped out, and some nations like Japan, Italy and Russia are currently losing population. US natural population growth is just above the replacement level, with immigration accounting for a bit more.

Answer 2

mom nature and wars are doing a sturdy job at wiping chunks of the inhabitants out at recent and constantly have achieved and could proceed to realize this as long because of the fact the planet survives. only think of in case you could what the inhabitants could be if working example the final 2 worldwide wars had not have got here approximately, if Hitler had not have massacred 5 million Jews etc etc. look now at Pakistan and the floods. The sheer numbers of lives lost could have a huge effect on the destiny inhabitants.

Answer 3

Some 4-legged creatures require a range of a few square kilometers as their territory.

2-legged creatures need far more, being as complex in their requirements as we are.

Hence, 7 billion is roughly 3 billion too many.