lol. She is one to talk. But then again she should know shouldnt she.
2007-12-02 12:40:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Your angst will be shared by many. Be assured that either choice is exponentially better than the opposition. Just look at their surge they were so proud of! They bragged, but the truth is the Iraqis were benched. Be aware of a need for a "new surge" ie: escalation. Vote for any candidate with the will to extract us. Just don't have buyers remorse when the new President has to deal with the FUBAR brought on by the present failed policy of ego. The question is: who will best deal with 8 years of republican attack dogs without emotionally folding. Who will have the most support from their party when this abuse and Civil Strife starts?
2016-04-07 04:37:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt it since he has been honest and upfront about all of his failings and all of his busines dealings both past and present. He has opened his records to the public and the public will indeed make that judgement if they haven't already.
Hillary should keep her mouth shut however because she REFUSES to have the documents pertaining to her role in the White House as Clinton's first lady to the public so that we can discern whether that has actually given her ANY EXPERIENCE AT ALL and since the administration in which she CLAIMS to have played a role had so much scandal BESIDES Whitewater and Lewinsky that she will not adress she might actually end up shining a spotlight on herself whilst trying to assassinate the character of a good man.
JUST ONE MORE REASON I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR HILLARY !!
2007-12-02 12:51:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
To answer your question:
Hillary may know something the rest of us don't. Remember the news articles a couple of weeks ago about "Hillary having dirt on Obama". If she has it now would be the time to use it.
It is a case of one who lives in glass houses throwing the first stone, but Hillary has proved that no tactic is too low in her quest for power.
2007-12-02 12:45:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by T-Bone 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
That's somewhat accurate, Senator Obama takes money from lobbyists and corporations, while selling himself as the "anti-establishment" candidate.. He really doesn't seem to follow through on anything he advocates, for instance he spoke out against the Patriot Act, then voted in favor of reauthorizing it.. he accuses her of flip flopping, but he has done the same thing several times on the issue of social security.. and the same vote he criticizes Hillary for, he missed himself and sponsored the exact same legislation designating the IRG a terrorist organization back in April..
If voters did research instead of just relying on surface impressions then Obama wouldn't be leading in any polls
2007-12-02 12:51:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not if she is comparing them to the "character issues" of her faithful , caring , loving , Slick Willie !!!!! See ; Hillary thinks` that everyone is stupid and has forgotten her husbands` escapades for the last 25 years . I would think she would think trice before making ones` "character" an issue in her campaign !!!
2007-12-02 14:30:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do not plan on voting for a Democrat but as far as character goes Obama has wayyyy more than Hillary, Hillary tries to please everyone while Obama is more principled, sorry but thats the truth.
2007-12-02 12:49:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by noituloeve maerd 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Hillary AND obama don't know their ******* from a hole in the ground....do YOU want that steaming pile of dung running this country? Not I. Many of the most liberal people I speak to agree that they are both retarded and should be institutionalized.
2007-12-02 12:50:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by The prophet of DOOM 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Does this have t do with the pin and saluting the flag stuff, is that true? it's funny though, she is attacking his race and his religion and his sex, HOW DARE SHE! It will be intersting what she has, cold not have gotten it when Bill was president and she had all te top secret files brought to her. Super stats she ran the ship. Who knows. Take care.
2007-12-02 12:49:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by R J 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have seen two faced politicians before. But Obama is a three faced one if ever there was such a thing. That man is a phony, through and through. Hillary is correct, and the poles reflect that.
2007-12-02 13:35:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
All the candidates I have seen have major problems in their goals and character. Only one of the candidates has stuck to the constitution, and that is Ron Paul. He is a rep. and he always votes according to the constitution.
2007-12-02 12:49:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Strider 1
·
1⤊
2⤋