good one, separate Jesus from Texas!
liberals have no sense of humor and are ruuuuuuude
2007-12-02 11:43:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by SQD 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Another inane question designed only to spread hatred, bias, prejudice and political bigotry. There are several problems with your question:
1. It's not only 'liberals' who want separation of church and state; most 'conservatives' do, too;
2. The people named 'Jesus' coming across the border are people called "Hay-suz" (their name is not pronounced as 'Jesus' and has nothing to do with the Christ);
3. Separation of church and state has absolutely nothing to do with the problem of illegal immigration;
4. I doubt that you even know the definition of a 'liberal' or a 'conservative'. You're a 'ditto head' that has been brainwashed by Rush Limbaugh's propaganda and you have no idea what the artificial label you've attached to yourself really means.
So why keep trying to fuel the flames of opposition when 'liberals' and 'conservatives' SHOULD be fighting together to protect the very ideals they both embrace?? Dividing this country [as the 'media darlings' like Al Franken, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and Shawn Hannity do while they laugh all the way to the bank] serves no productive purpose. Why not invest your energies into trying to unite this nation and fight the fight against a monopolistic, corrupt two-party political system that restricts voter choice and hampers truly free elections in America? -RKO- 12/02/07
2007-12-02 11:52:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
you're easily precise. It would not. The declare approximately organising a "wall between church and state" got here from a letter written by utilising Thomas Jefferson. It became misinterpreted by utilising the liberal SCOTUS and liberals ever on account that. The purpose of the 1st modification is for human beings to have freedom of religion. not freedom FROM faith. all the 1st means with reference to faith is what you reported; the federal government (and observe I reported federal and not state government) shall not create a countrywide could connect or you would be sorry faith. The historic reference is the Church of britain. Liberals have been continuously and intentionally (the two that's planned or they're blithering morons) distorting it ever on account that to push THEIR secularist ideals. they're too obdurate and ignorant to realize that their ideals are actually not from now on than the different style of religion (or greater properly placed, an anti-faith). The hypocrisy is strategies blowing.
2016-11-13 07:37:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals don't just "want" seperation of church and state, they understand it is the law of the land. And try to behave with that in mind. Most of the time.
2007-12-02 11:43:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why are conservatives only worried about Mexicans when the Canadian border is open and longer and the 9/11 highjackers came through there?
2007-12-02 11:37:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Actually, it is spelled Jesus but is pronounced Hay-suus. In addition to this, the "liberal" George W Bush wanted to grant amnesty to 20,000,000 illegal Mexicans, many named Jesus (Hay-suus)
2007-12-02 11:37:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
It's a common name in Mexico and means nothing other then a name.
What I fail to understand, is you are trying to connect the dots when it is apparent that you have lost your common sense.
Peace
Jim
.
2007-12-02 11:56:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do mind it.
Have your forgotten the Guest Worker Program was promoted by Bush?
have your forgotten that it was Republicans who forgot to fund their fence?
2007-12-02 11:51:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
seperation of church and state has nothing to do with anybody named jesus.
2007-12-02 11:37:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
How do you know their names?
2007-12-02 12:22:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋