English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Fact, Bush didnt want to go to war, but he listened to the Democrats, so its mostly their fault, the war.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314561,00.html

2007-12-02 11:18:47 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Mmmm...any link to FoxNews immediately dismisses anything you said prior and after.

But it's good to know Dubya is a follower and not a leader, I always thought that was the case and you've just confirmed it.

2007-12-02 11:21:35 · answer #1 · answered by Alex G 6 · 8 2

When the Senate voted on the Iraq War Resolution, Republicans controlled the House and the Senate was narrowly controlled by the Democrats. They got the resolution to a vote in October 2002 right before the midterm elections. President Bush was popular at the time, as was support for striking Iraq, the Democrats wanted to hold on to the Senate, and were pressured to vote for the resolution. If not, the Democrats likely would have lost the Senate right then and there, and if it was rejected the resolution would have been re-introduced into the new Republican Senate and passed. Same result either way.

2007-12-02 11:25:23 · answer #2 · answered by Coats 2 · 3 0

earlier I answer, enable me superb you on one factor. opposite to lefty idealism, there have been certainly WMD's which mentioned lefties comfortably decide to overlook that their ilk (the Dems) in government additionally believed existed. no longer reported because of the dicey concern surrounding US/Russia family members replaced into the undeniable fact that Iraq shares an prolonged border with Syria and had a comfortable relationship going, wherein mentioned WMD's does no longer have been confusing to spirit away past to the ousting of the only guy regularly occurring to have used them. Now, i comprehend that interior the proper little international of liberalism the denizens are allowed to think of in a vacuum on an identical time as watching by way of a eating straw, one might ask what the hell does that have been given to do with issues. properly, no longer something formally yet i've got been around long sufficient to correctly known that WMD's do no longer %. and decide the place they're stored. on an identical time as i'm at it, there is yet another factor that needs correcting. those farmers who have been killed in Vietnam have been squaddies. sure they did no longer positioned on uniforms and truthfully farmed and had households yet they have been very lots in touch interior the attempt to take care of their united states of america. i comprehend that concept is alien to lefties yet cling with me. you notice, merely because of the fact maps instruct a border keeping apart North from South Vietnam, it does no longer propose that the human eye can distinguish that are South and that are North. Many an American soldier replaced into the two killed or completely disabled because of the fact they weren't waiting to make out the version (or have any reason to) and have been sucker-punched in case you will. look up references to little Vietnamese little ones advised to run as much as that American soldier with a stay grenade. final, yet no longer least, international historic previous has shown all in the process the an prolonged time that once there is conflict there are civilian casualties. that's why I combat liberalism here interior the States because of the fact in case you had your way, the hammer and sickle may be waving interior the Washington air. i'm sorry your recommendations has been poisoned by using liberalism.

2016-10-18 21:49:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Based on Rove and Fox News. Two of the biggest sacks of crap ever to take a breath. IF you'd believe anything you hear from either of those two sources then I've got some great swamp land, I mean water front property, to sell you.

2007-12-02 12:13:57 · answer #4 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1 0

bush wasn't push into anything,richard clarke,the former terrorism advisor said bush and the executive party was trying to make ties to iraq and 9/11 the on 9/12

2007-12-02 11:27:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Uh huh. And exactly WHICH Dem did that? There weren't any IN Congress when Bush-League went to war.

So what youre basically saying is, Bush-League is SUCH a wimp he couldnt stand up to a couple Dems out of a Congress full of mostly Republicans? Is that the point youre making?

2007-12-02 11:24:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

LOL you got this info as TRUTH from ROVE sorry truth and Rove should NOT be used in the same sentence.................what a loser........ Rove that is and he took the Last of the Lifeboats.........cant wait for the Indictments to come out...............

will Bush include a list of Pre-emptive pardons just in case..........

2007-12-02 11:41:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Even you don't believe that. Just look at the source (Fox and Karl Rove)

BTW Bush gave numerous speeches asking Congress to pass the Resolution. More Republican crap.

2007-12-02 11:22:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8 1

Pffft yea right, bush is a war president just except it...there is no getting out of that

2007-12-02 11:22:34 · answer #9 · answered by Angel Marie 4 · 8 0

LOL, Mr. Rove has once again rewritten history to erase both his and Bushes finger prints on Bushes war of choice

2007-12-02 11:22:27 · answer #10 · answered by jean 7 · 10 1

They should have blamed Larry Craig if they're looking for a fall guy, he's a lost cause anyway.

2007-12-03 12:20:36 · answer #11 · answered by adrianne 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers