2007-12-02 11:05:01 · 19 answers · asked by . 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He is not protecting the US from terrorism. Bin Laden is either dead or hiding in Pakistan. By not catching Bin Laden however is able to trot him out when it is necesarry to bolster public opinion of the "war on terrorism". He will not close the borders because many large corporations depend on illegal immigrants to perform the work that they claim Americans won't do. Americans really just won't do those jobs for slave labor but the corporations want to get away with paying as little as possible.
2007-12-02 11:09:41 · answer #1 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 13⤊ 3⤋
Not blaming Clinton, but Clinton was practically handed Bin Laden and declined. So Clinton, like Bush, didn't believe there was enough intelligence to support Bin Laden as a priority.
2016-04-07 04:27:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because what Bush says, Bush doesn't know! his mouth and his brain are out of sync!
Remember, he did not know where Afghanistan was on the world map!
Let's just say it ain't his fault being where he is!
It's Pat Robertson's and the Republicans Fault!
Hey Don Imus ( Inus? Panus?? whatever)... when he opened mouth, his brain skiped the beats...
Same with Sen Craig, he doesn't now that he is what he is , his brain ignores all the signs ( 8 of them ) he is a closet gay!
Three classic morons of the century!
2007-12-02 22:30:42 · answer #3 · answered by WO LEE 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden is the best thing that ever happened to Bush...why would he catch him?
Don't like our latest repressive Senate bill, stripping you of even more rights?
Bin Laaaaaden...booga booga booga!
Don't like our insane waste of taxpayer dollars on a doomed war in Iraq?
Bin Laaaaaden...booga booga booga!
2007-12-02 14:54:36 · answer #4 · answered by V2K1 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I ask that same question with no answers. Remember, even his supporters AKA We Bush Botts, don't always agree with him or his cabinet.
Remember, ALL politicians are out for themselves first. You as the voter will always come dead last. I know that's not the nicest or most pleasant answer but it's true. Even most of MY opposition have agreed whole heartedly on this subject matter.
Do like the rest of us and remain vocal, I for one agree with you on this...time is UP!
2007-12-02 11:19:58 · answer #5 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 8⤊ 0⤋
And why did he make blundering miscalculations like invading an Arab country that would in effect create more terrorists around the world? Are we safer now that there are more terrorists out there than before 9/11?
2007-12-02 11:20:09 · answer #6 · answered by Frank 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
A scared electorate is the stock in trade of GWB and Co.
2007-12-02 14:52:11 · answer #7 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush doesn't pass bills congress does, but he can still propose them, especially when the fence building bill has already been passed, now all he has to do is demand funding which he has yet to do.
2007-12-02 11:28:21 · answer #8 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
if he caught bin laden, he wouldn't be able to justify his continued wars in afghanistan and iraq and potentially in iran...
he can't close the borders because then his good buddies in mexico will get mad at him....the president of mexico got mad a year or so ago when bush mentioned clamping down on illegal immigrants....can't make mexico mad!
2007-12-02 11:22:36 · answer #9 · answered by misstiaemail 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
same reason he won't go after the saudis for funding 9/11,supplying the 15 highjackers for 9/11 and 50% of the attacks in iraq are performed by saudis because bin laiden and the saudis has stock in bush oil company.
2007-12-02 11:10:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 4⤋