I think it's funny how the Economist is promoting Bush as the only hope for a peace process between Israel and Palestine.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1930298/posts
2007-12-02 10:14:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Get Dressed yes it is a dog and pony show lol!
2007-12-02 10:19:13 · update #1
I not an avid fan of theatre...
2007-12-02 10:16:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
This whole thing is a farce.
Mahmoud Abbas and Ehud Olmert both simply "agreed to agree" to "take on core disputes in talks." Absolutely not a single issue regarding the conflict itself was even raised at the Annapolis summit.
What is even more telling is that the US gov't would invite Syria to the "talks" while still giving Iran the cold shoulder. The "peace diplomat" label would only be applicable if Bush was, for once, actually willing to at least engage in direct talks with the Iranian regime instead of anteing up his war rhetoric.
2007-12-02 13:33:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
My heavens, I never have been flashed, yet I did accidentally flash some individuals as quickly as. i replaced into interior the hospital some time lower back and desperate to take a stoll to the merchandising section. properly, I wasn't thinking approximately what i replaced into donning and, enable's merely say that those hospital robes do no longer flow away lots to the mind's eye on the backside. The nurse got here up from at the back of me and positioned a blanket over my shoulders . . . i replaced into questioning why it replaced right into a sprint drafty lower back there!
2016-10-18 21:28:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm all for the change in title pending tangible results. That would be pretty monumental, but I won't get my hopes up. Even still, I'm pretty certain that a best case scenario peaceful diplomatic deal would do little to overshadow the campaigns launched in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2007-12-03 02:35:45 · answer #4 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sad attempt to move him from War President to Diplomat Ex President. It's no secret that George Bush wants to rehabilitate his failing reputation, however I find this completely unpalatable. Does he think the world can easily forget the fiasco he has caused? What credentials does he even have to pull this off?
And how long has this situation been going on, since the inception of Israel post WWII , I guess Bush is the savior now?
2007-12-02 10:39:52 · answer #5 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well after the Democratic party made the president of AIPAC, the Chairmen of the Democratic Party in 1997,
You really think the Democrats will try and get the Israeli's to make peace?
After all, Bush is the first US president to ever get Israel to dismantle settlements.
And the 2nd US President to convince Israel to withdraw from territory taken in the 1968 war.
Bush - Gaza
Carter - Siani
So compared to previous presidents, Bush is looking pretty good on the Israel/Palestinian issue.
2007-12-02 10:30:17 · answer #6 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I like the agreement of peace they made which begins at the end of 2008.
2007-12-02 10:33:40 · answer #7 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that he's a complete idiot that could not ever possibly have what it takes to facilitate peace. Your link says it all.
2007-12-02 15:51:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
biggest hyprocrital bs ever.he's basicly trying to get these guys to use diplomacy to reach a comprimise peacefully,why the hell u didn't do that whit iraq u pieces of garbage.
2007-12-02 10:28:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
it's a little too late for change.he will never achieve redemption in my eyes.
2007-12-03 08:16:50 · answer #10 · answered by CHER 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a war criminal
2007-12-02 14:18:59 · answer #11 · answered by Soul Man 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋