Actually, the war is there fault, and even though we are winning the war, we are winning because of Bush and not the Democrats, even though the war was there idea, fact.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314495,00.html
2007-12-02 10:01:54 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Another one of Rove's lies and you are dumb enough to believe it.
2007-12-02 10:04:07 · answer #1 · answered by notyou311 7 · 12⤊ 4⤋
whilst the Senate voted on the Iraq conflict determination, Republicans controlled the homestead and the Senate became into narrowly controlled by the Democrats. They have been given the determination to a vote in October 2002 proper previously the midterm elections. President Bush became into popular on the time, as became into help for astounding Iraq, the Democrats needed to hold directly to the Senate, and have been forced to vote for the determination. If not, the Democrats probable could have lost the Senate proper then and there, and if it became into rejected the determination could have been re-presented into the recent Republican Senate and surpassed. same result the two way.
2016-10-10 02:35:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrong, as usual, neocon; you are just spreading another Conservative lie:
“[Andy] Card Rejects Rove’s Claim That Congress Pushed Bush To War: ‘His Mouth Gets Ahead Of His Brain’ “
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/11/30/card-discredits-rove/
2007-12-02 13:05:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I see you listed "Fox News" as your source. that explains it. I can SPIT further than I trust Fox News.
For the record, BUSH wanted the Republican't controlled Congress to vote on attacking Iraq in November, 2001, barely a month after 9-11.
2007-12-02 10:16:13 · answer #4 · answered by for Da Ben Dan--Dennyhill 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Why are both Republicans and Democrats trying to place the blaim of war on each other, while neither party shows any inclincation to end it?
2007-12-02 10:10:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
are you high????the Bushs(plural),have waged this war for over twenty years.Clinton slowed it down during his terms.then lil bush started right backup.there is no reason for this country to be in Iraq.We're not there for oil or democracy.just like vietnam,we're there for heroin.if you want to hurt a drug dealer,you go after his weapons(pentagon),their money(trade center),and home(white house).911 was your drug deal gone bad.it was hidden from you right on the tv you were watching.WAKE UP!!!!!REMEMBER 911 is why went over in the first place.By that logic,if I'm chasing you in florida,I should start looking for you in california.
2007-12-02 10:17:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Its all Bush-co,s fault all of it from day one. but i am not surprised the buck tries to pass it on to the Dem,s...talk about lame...do you remember this NO WMDS IN IRAQ....wait OK OK ,,ya i see now I did cheer for the greased rope on Saddam's neck,can Dem,s take responsibility for that?...chow F.P
2007-12-02 10:30:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
ROFL!! That is too funny!! Obviously noone even clicked on the link.
They started rambling and spewing their ignorance!! ROFL!
2007-12-02 11:47:44 · answer #8 · answered by Google Rules! 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
bush is just trying to finish what his dad couldnt. this isnt a war we are just in the middle of a civil war to make sure the people we want to come out on top. its bull ****
2007-12-02 10:09:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
When talking about a collective group of people, they are referred to as "their". "There" is a direction or place. Now what incredibly intelligent "fact" were you mouthing off about?
2007-12-02 10:10:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
This is a lie, I worked in the Senate at the time of the debate and it was the Republicans that were able to corral some dem votes (but not all), it was not a dem initiative. So check the facts, Jack.
2007-12-02 10:05:56 · answer #11 · answered by C.S. 5 · 10⤊ 3⤋