for those of you who believe man made global warming is a hoax . . .?

Question

do you have a single shred of proof -- video feed of scientists manipulating graphs, audio of climatology professors conspiring to fool the public, etc., anything at all, that either proves or supports your beliefs?

otherwise that's a fraudulent claim to say the least, and the ones supporting lies are you.

if your going to post in refute of my statement without a link (of your proof), thank you for proving my point.

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution_png

this for one. i can find a ton more, but first i'd like to see you refute that

Answer 1

Okay, my rant...

If we all lived during the era long ago when all the glaciers were melting in the ice age, would we have blamed the melting on global warming? Sure we would, because the left will always find a way to blame someone for every little thing that occurs.

What we have to remember is that the earth is a living and evolving entity. Every change it undergoes is not a result of you, me or those mean bad corporations. The earth is much bigger than us. It is because the earth is what it is... an evolving planet that will not only change during our lifetime, but for generations to come.

Everyone has heard of the theory of the continental plates shifting to form the continents as we know them today. If humans existed back then to the degree we do today... that is, with all the advances in technlogy and all the knowledge like we have today... wouldn't we have gone beserk trying to figure out what the heck was going on with the planet?! The right would have been blaming the left, the left blaming the right, and all sorts of theories and conjecture would have been flying around. During it all, Mother Earth would have been sitting there laughing her *** off thinking, "You human idiots... the plates are gonna shift regardless of what you've done or what you could possibly do. Just let me be me and go on living your lives!"

Al Gore and the rest of the global warming bandwagon... let the earth be the earth... neither you, me or anyone else can kill it. We do have a responsibility to do our best to be good stewards of her. However, any mismanagement will not destroy her. She is much bigger than we can control or detrimentally affect.

Rant over for now...

Answer 2

That quantity is some distance from statistically beside the point. It if some distance from "0 factor 0." Thing approximately this: plenty of remedy if given in very small dosages. A tablet would handiest be .half% some thing drug is meant to be serving to you. A small percent may have a giant affect, that is why the emerging stages of CO2 have such a lot of individuals worried. Water vapor isn't being banned considering the fact that individuals don't generate it. What results how so much water vapor the air can preserve is the temperature of the air. This is why the air has a tendency to be drier in iciness. Cold air can not preserve as so much water. When the earth will get warmer, extra water vapor enters the surroundings. Water vapor does "rationale international warming" however more commonly it's an have an impact on of it. Lastly, do not believe beginner study, or what 'one man' instructed you. Heck, do not even believe me. Go and discover a systematic magazine, no longer a mainstream journal or guide, or a internet site claiming to symbolize the reality, no longer mainstream lies. A truly actual peer reviewed clinical magazine. This signifies that different scientists learn the item and approve of it. That method your beginner study comes instantly from the respectable supply, and also you get the nice information.

Answer 3

Few people I know would dispute charts and graphs that show the Earth has been warming in the modern era. The question is merely how much of this is caused by human activity. That is it. Also, what of the periods of warming and cooling that existed before industrialization? What of the periods of warming and cooling that existed before there were any humans at all? What should have been done to prevent the melting of the Wisconsin Glacier?

Answer 4

As you can see from the answers provided, no, they cannot.

SMK1001 is simply a liar. Of the hundreds of planetary bodies in our solar system (moons and planets), a couple are currently warming, a couple more are currently cooling, and most are showing no appreciable temperature change at all.

And how exactly do you propose that we've gathered temperature data for other planets over 500 years??

Besides which, solar output has decreased over the past 30 years while global warming has accelerated rapidly.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6290228.stm
http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media/proceedings_a/rspa20071880.pdf

Answer 5

I am an astronomer at UCLA...Hold up a graph for the rate of warming for each planet in our solar system for the last 500 or more years...Guess what??? Every graph is the same...Why??? Because the warming is caused by the output of the sun...Our sun is a variable output star. It has been on an increasing trend for several hundred years. I must admit that there is one other possibility...Gas guzzling SUV's are being driven on every planet from mercury to the minor planet Pluto!!! Unfortunately, the evidence points to the sun and not auto emissions or industry...We really need to stop trying to scare everyone...I can't figure out why they want to scare us all...Rest assured, we have more to fear from wars and crime than we have from global warming...

Answer 6

the mantra about anthropogenic co2 emmissions from my reading pretty much stems from i believe it was the geshel study.
I am sure you have seen the regurtitaged man produces 150times more CO2 than volcanos havent you?
reanalyzing that data at a later time shows this to be so far off that we cant even come close to assigning a scientific margin of error. its more like 85-90 so being off by 40plus percent isnt exactly a ballpark figure now is it.

Now lets go to the IPCC and their statement not long ago that sea levels would rise by about 34 inches. Then about 2 years later... oh i guess we were off a bit its more like 17 inches... again a 50% margin of error?

And you call these scientists?

Answer 7

Global warming multimedia has become a billion dollar industry, skeptical scientists are sharing there views for free and are not looking to make money. People who do not believe global warming is being caused by humans are content with that belief while it is people like you and Al-gore who are so hysterical on this issue that they absolutely refuse to hear an alternate point of view.

Answer 8

man made... um well could be to a point, but the absents of any source or link from you is quit telling as well. How about this, the earth is getting warmer (fact), lets all just conserve and put less garbage in the environment okay. When attacking, be prepared to receive a defensive posture. So why not just do what we need to do, and stop the crap about who has the most scientists on their side.

Answer 9

The political diatribes that the global warming huxsters feed to us is proof enough it is a hoax. When the socialists get together and beat up capitalism, it is pretty obvious the global warming issue is based on politics, not science. I've done alot of research into the climate models, and they are so complicated and so lacking in data, I wouldn't trust them.

Don't let the charlatans scare you.

Answer 10

Fact the earths avg temp has risen but how much? According to the Global weather records the avg. temp has risen less than 1 degree Fahrenheit over the last 100 years. Does that indicate global warming? I think not