should tna do a huge step forward and buy wwe because lately wwe has been wasting more perfectly good talent then anything and tna needs a step forward so they can accually get more television deals etc.
2007-12-02 09:29:44 · 19 answers · asked by s 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
let's get one thing straight, I know tna does not have the money to buy wwe. I know that most of tna is throwaways, I just wanted to say that tna should get more fresher talent out of companies that they accually get. The only way that is accually possible is if they buy out companies or join forces with companies. I just don't see tna joining so that leaves us with the one option
2007-12-03 13:35:54 · update #1
TNA doesn't have enough pennies in the pickle jar to buy out WWE.
WWE's revenue in fiscal 2006 (from May 2005 to April 2006) was approximately US$400 million, with a net profit of approximately $47 million. As of August 2006, the company's market capitalization is over $1 billion.
2007-12-02 09:36:23 · answer #1 · answered by J Truth 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First off even if the WWE was for sale, TNA sure doesn't even come close to having that kind of money.
For now they need to be 2 different companies.
Someday the WWE will ttry to buy TNA but I think TNA would have to be in really bad shape before they would sell to Vince.
But there is no way TNA will ever have enough money to buy the WWE.
I think TNA has a much better product right now than the WWE. But too many WWE fans are not true wrestling fans, so they will never like TNA. True wrestling fans like different styles, but WWE fans only like soap operas with boring wrestling matches added in now and then.
2007-12-02 10:08:26 · answer #2 · answered by komets.geo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a HUGE TNA fan but TNA hasn't got the money and they aren't big enough at the moment,don't forget that neither company is for sale.
I agree with you that WWE is wasting talent and storylines lately but hopefully when TNA becomes serious competition WWE will pick up.
2007-12-02 09:44:49 · answer #3 · answered by COB RULE 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Tna doesnt even have six times the amount of money the WWE has and they dont need to buy that company because right now they dont even have competition.
2007-12-02 10:58:06 · answer #4 · answered by torriekanellis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's never happening.
They'd have to buy all the available stock on the stock market and even then they wouldn't be in control of WWE.
And no, WWE will never buy TNA either. TNA has said they'd shut down before selling to WWE.
2007-12-02 09:34:35 · answer #5 · answered by TestSubjekt 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
rankings clever tna is getting merely below ecw so im guessing if this did take place wwe might by utilising out tna and then maximum in all likelihood upload on yet another coach because of the fact no 3 exhibits merely isn't sufficient for Mr. McMahon now's it. finally i think of tna would be bought out yet not for a whilst because of the fact there isn't that elecricity like there became while it became the monday night wars between uncooked and wcw.
2016-11-13 07:17:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha
KID WWE WILL BUY TNA,TNA WILL CAN'T BUY WWE TOO POOR
2007-12-02 09:35:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA cannot buy WWE even if they tried. TNA is a great program, but WWE has way more cash than TNA.
2007-12-02 09:41:43 · answer #8 · answered by .......... 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You can't just buy out a company they have to sell and agree with your offer. WWE has more money than TNA.
2007-12-02 09:32:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The WWE will buy out TNA watch and learn.
2007-12-02 09:37:41 · answer #10 · answered by . 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋