And don't say Bush is. He is clearly not smart enough.
2007-12-02 08:51:38 · 59 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
if not then she is really close.
2007-12-02 08:53:46 · answer #1 · answered by wildeyes_heart_of_stone 3 · 5⤊ 5⤋
i think she could stick to the Clinton doctorine, social classes with conservative controls. It labored quite plenty in the 'ninety's', keep in mind all that peace, prosperity and good will? i think she could govern from the middle and be an astounding chief. regrettably, i'm not pulling for her because of the fact the righties have so demonized the Clintons (precisely because of the fact the ARE such astounding leaders), that it will added artwork to divide the country. we opt for a sparkling face who can attempt and positioned across us at the same time.
2016-10-10 02:25:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is how i interpret your question:
could hillary clinton be a fictional character from a book of fairy tales?
I doubt it, quite frankly the question is rather absurd. and she was born hundreds of years after the writing and later gathering of scripture, so she can´t have been an influence either.But why pick hillary? she is the most evil person running for office, even though romney is a prominent figure in a formerly racist organisation, and the rest of the republicans, with the exeption of mccain wants to use torture.
grow up dude..
2007-12-03 08:43:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Considering the anti-christ is typically thought of as a man this is a truly pathetic attempt at provocation. The same thing was said about Bill Clinton. I thought you bible-thumping Cons could do better than this.
Speaking of smart, how long did it take you to think this up?
2007-12-02 09:00:05 · answer #4 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Hilary could be the Anti-Christ, maybe we could shave off her hair to see if the 666 is tattooed underneath.
2007-12-06 04:01:44 · answer #5 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The anti-christ is supposed to be almost universally liked (at first). Hillary Clinton is not anywhere close to being universally liked.
So, no.
Oh you weren't serious? Well, then yes, I smell sulfur everytime I see that woman on tv.
2007-12-02 08:57:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. I don't think the anti-Christ is here, and you wouldn't know it if he/she was. You would be a fan of whomever it is, because the anti-Christ is prophesied to be very popular with the people, and very intelligent.
Who knows? Maybe the anti-Christ is in my screen name. Maybe Jim Gaffigan is the anti-Christ. There's no way of knowing.
2007-12-02 11:43:26 · answer #7 · answered by Ron Paul 2112 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No... the Antichrist is or will be male. The slam on GWB's intelligence was unnecessary and incorrect... He doesn't qualify for other reasons.... The Antichrist will be a charismatic person that will be able to lie without any qualms and still charm the populace... that would be more like Bill Clinton... (He's not him either)
2007-12-02 09:02:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, I don't see the Churches or the world government giving her power.
On the other hand, we do see that in Bush.
Remember the anti-Christ is suppose to come selling the ideas of world peace, freedom, and using those ideas to hijack Christianity to do his bidding.
2007-12-02 09:14:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. The Anti-Christ is charismatic and a unifier. Hillary is a divider and her charisma is beginning to age...
2007-12-02 08:58:35 · answer #10 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush has been elected twice lol. People just hate him because he is president. Everyone always hates the president and we always complain about them.
Yes, Hillary is the Anti-Christ. If she gets elected i am so moving to Canada.
2007-12-02 09:03:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋