English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is up with the back to back timeouts before the bufffalo field goal? He even hired a TIMEOUT COACH to manage timeouts yet they get a 15 yard unsportsmanlike penalty! How can a hall fo fame coach not know about this rule? So what do you guys think, should he step down after the season and who will be the next coach?

2007-12-02 08:49:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

6 answers

I think he will. Unfortunately the team still has lots of clock management issues, timeout issues, strange play calling, etc. Times it seems like they are moving in the right direction, but more times it seems they are taking two steps back.

2007-12-02 09:13:42 · answer #1 · answered by mikea_va 6 · 1 1

Since I've been watching the Redskins, and football since Sonny Jurgensen played, I have seen far dumber calls. This is a Hall of Fame coach who was asked to come out of retirement and anyone with an ounce of brains already knows this will be his last year by choice. His mind is on a Pro-Bowl player who was shot and killed allegedly by 4 punks. I don't expect BA, just wanted to answer.

2007-12-02 11:10:16 · answer #2 · answered by jjoy4444 6 · 2 0

Oh for heaven's sake, give the man a break!!!!! Gibbs is a great coach, a Hall-of-Fame coach. He made a mistake that no one would expect for him to make, but he has been under circumstances that most coaches will fortunately never have to understand. The man is human.

2007-12-02 09:46:57 · answer #3 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 1 0

I saw the same thing and started laughing. Dumb move. I was hoping for a win outta the Redskins sense the death of Sean Taylor but obviously Gibbs needs to back down. I think they should hire someone with experience maybe that played college football. They need some help

2007-12-02 08:54:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i discover it hilarious that any one who can type is retarded-adequate to think of the reality there became into an attack is why all and sundry could opt for Obama to step-down. indexed under are advantageous components OBAMA AND CLINTON informed us approximately, none of that are you able to be conscious to ANY "assaults below Bush." > Obama ILLEGALLY (in accordance to his very own legal experts) stepped-in to furnish a branch of AL-QAEDA administration of Libya, putting the power into enemy territory. > Obama singled-out that facility - in enemy territory - to be the LEAST risk-free U.S. diplomatic facility everywhere in the international. > AFTER it became into attacked, he decreased protection much greater. > Upon VERY particular warning approximately THIS attack, he refused to augment protection. > in this attack, he ordered the attack not be interrupted. > AFTER the attack he tried to circumvent the attackers being pointed out. I understand that because of the fact the STATE branch AND THE WHITE homestead pronounced all of those issues, you rather believe FOX made it up. i can not help you with your pathology.

2016-10-10 02:25:28 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes, he should...today was just another example of his utter lack of focus...as a cowboys fan, i have to say that it's just sad to watch him standing slack-jawed on the sideline, oblivious to what's going on...

2007-12-02 12:55:10 · answer #6 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers