I object to the term "war on terror", it's misleading. Winning the war? what is there to win? you think that you are going to incur less or more hatred towards America by bombing countries and killing innocent people?
2007-12-02 08:55:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by stevie 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It replaced into winnable while it wasn't a war yet. while it grew to become right into a conflict of 'us' against 'them' it unexpectedly grew to become very plenty greater stable to win, however. perhaps weapons will win the war, united states of america has actual made damned specific that in the time of the mean time there is not any different way forward. i've got not got self belief that, however. so a techniques the only ingredient the weapons have completed is galvanize a serious backlash against the west, fairly pondering each and all the stable will after 9/11. It nevertheless amazes me how that replaced into squandered. Can the war on terror be gained? perhaps, the question is, is it nicely actual worth the fee?
2016-09-30 11:12:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by lindholm 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We can win the war on terror...or as it should be called...the war against radical Islam. That's the first step...to call it what it truly is. This is a sect of Islam who wants to conquer the world and make the world one giant caliphate where we would all convert or face the sword. It's time for us to stop sugar-coating who our enemy is.
Then...get the rest of the world to see the threat that faces them. You have plots in London to blow up the subway system, riots in France, even Islamists fighting in western China. A nuclear Iran is scary...just as scary is letting Islamists take over in Pakistan where they already have nukes.
I'm for cooperation...but I'm also for making sure that it is going to become the responsibility of moderate Muslims to speak out and join them in condemning those that hijack their religion. If they want to prove to be a religion of peace...now would be the time to prove it.
Next...work with other nations regarding intelligence. Get police and law enforcement involved. For companies that allegedly may be doing business with terror groups, freeze their assets and shut them down. Arrest leaders of mosques that preach hatred towards the West. Work with the moderate Muslims in these communities. Finally...
If military use is needed...don't be politically correct about it. Bring down the full might of the military on their heads. Send the masterminds of terrorism running for their lives. The only thing they will respect is strength. If someone screams about our supposedly being unfair...ask them about murdering innocent civilians on purpose.
2007-12-02 09:06:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by bruiserkc2 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No not with 23 senators including hillary obama, and a few more that are running for Pres. voting down the bill on june 6th 2007, to make English the no. 1 language in America, We are lucky if we have a few more years as a free nation!!!! unless all you people out there get it together, Young and Old, you all need to start finding out what's going on. No media from Montana, that someone put the Mexican flag over our's, why no media?????????????, and an answer to your question, all of the above, we are slipping closer to Communism, faster that you can count, so get out and do something about it, WAKE UP AMERICA, BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-12-02 08:29:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by poopsie 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
For as long as America backs Israel in their illegal land grab, and CIA agents carry out covert operations in muslim countries, there will be no peace and no freedom from terrorism.
Try making the first move towards real peace.
Don`t blame others for the retaliation of oppressed people, whos government is only there because American agents keep them there.
ex:- Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Jordon, Kuwait,Colombia. etc.
If a foriegn power tried to run America, would you like it.?
If another country decided that Texas should be run by Latino imegrants would you like it.?
If the answer to either of the questions is no. Then why the h**l do you do it to others and expect to live in peace..??
2007-12-02 09:07:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Terry M 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why can't people talk ?!
Why all this aggression ?!
We should set a standard, a rule, something like "YOU LEAVE US ALONE AND WE WILL LEAVE YOU ALONE".
I think this is a sentence that both sides would agree and abide by. Sounds simplistic, I know.... but maybe we should all go back to basics... start again. This way we will anihilate ourselves. One race will NEVER be able to dominate the world. It will never happen. Why ?! Because nature's rules aren't on that race's side... It has never happened before and will never happen in future.
2007-12-02 08:36:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by RED-CHROME 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They can only if they concede mistakes were made in the creation of Israel by forcing people from their homes & lands, and failing to address the Palestinian refugee problems, and the right of return. Until those issues are permanently resolved, and both sides make concessions, there will NEVER be peace. Extremeist resolve has proven this. Resolve the key issues, then terror should stop.
2007-12-02 08:26:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Terrorist should be the least of your troubles. There is no terrorism in the US.
We have taken out the leader of Iraq leaving it in a state of Civil War and we have created tension between Saudi Arabia, Iran, & Iraq.
Now who's the terrorists?
2007-12-02 08:14:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by christie 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
No, because there ins't any terrorism, except what the US is creating. Perhaps if Russia or China or Korea launches a nuke at us it would stop, but I doubt it, not unless Israel was taken out with us.
2007-12-02 08:19:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by stale mate 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
If we keep killing them we can. Killing them is the only way we can win. When the terrorists nuke some large European country, the United States will get help killing them.
2007-12-02 10:49:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋