He's a great president, and history will tell all.
2007-12-02 08:00:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Em E 4
·
9⤊
7⤋
I received this from a friend in California who served in the Navy for 30 years. He’s pro-freedom and understands very well what it means to fight against tyranny and for the freedom and rights of those in other countries. The video depicts why we are in Iraq. Notice the adults are voting, but are bringing their children with them. This is what one generation does for another.
In the US, we take for granted that events occur overnight. These people understand that they might die voting today, but they also know that someday their children and grandchildren will be able to vote for democracy without fear because they live in a country where they have fought side by side with others for the right to be free.
Why do I, as an American, support President Bush’s fight against tyranny in a country I may never visit? Because I hope that in the future my children and grandchildren can enjoy the pleasure of working and communicating with coworkers from other countries and visit other countries on vacations, and appreciate different cultures without fear from terrorist who want to oppress and cause fear. I also want the same for the children and grandchildren in Iraq. It’s a small world after all! Please watch the video below I posted in my source.
2007-12-02 13:30:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by meh? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Opinions are formed from others which indicate the current Bush has not done so well. If he resolves The Israel Palestinian Conflict he might get one positive outcome from his ter in office. Not likely it has been going on for ever. What a person could also ask is what a person thinks of Congress as it gave the go a head to war . I have the understanding that this is necessary for a decision on whetherto go to war as happened before in the decision to go to war withVietnam.Thoughts of war can cloud the minds of people and though lies were told if The Citizens were to not let this happen they would understand Oil for their cars was the motive. If Congress has a taste for war then voting will not help.Population control, separation from Greed. Oil Rationing, Greed as religion stopped from interference by Separartion law. things examined in new light to find new approaches as well as last.
2007-12-02 08:17:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by darren m 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I find it amusing that so many posters self-censor because they can't express themselves in a manner that doesn't violate Yahoo rules.
You should consider changing your respective opinions or your respective living conditions. Many countries will welcome you and your "free spirited" approach to President bashing.
President G. W. Bush has taken on the intelligencia of the world and SPANKED THEM, publicly.
They rave about how dim witted he is, and then fall into one of the traps he has set for them.
He could teach Ronnie about teflon and Bill about statesmanship.
The left has been utter demoralized to the point that they openly lie about anything and everything. The contradictions are amazing.
Now, he is setting the stage for the Dems, once more, to do an election year meltdown and we will have 4 more delightful years of Republican presidency.
Thank you, President Bush.
(I am echoed by over 122 million Iraqis and 32 million Israelis.)
2007-12-02 08:12:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
ALL wings - our focus is off. i am not against war. however, there will be no "israeli-palestinian peace". ever. no nation under islamic leadership will ever be at peace with any nation that is not under islamic leadership, especially not a jewish nation. as politically incorrect as my statements are (yet i speak the truth), understand that these people (of islamic nations) are submerged in a religion that teaches them to kill those who do not convert. there is a special hatred for jews in islam. i won't say that there are no peaceful muslims, yet if they are peaceful, they are not very good at their religion, are they? no. so why are we trying so stubbornly to bring "good-will" to the iraqi people when they will be trying to kill us the whole time? there are quicker and easier ways to kill yourselves that will not enable terrorism. to "impose" a "democracy" is a "contradiction", and a people who's god is dead will never control themselves to the point of ever acquiring a democracy - yet there will always be some tyrant glad to control the people when they can't control themselves! and that is what people like saddam hussein are for - and that is exactly what liberalism is causing here in america, as we look to our government as if it were god. follow that?
2007-12-04 09:55:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by remedy 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I was for him but now since I see he will not do nothing for our border and people are being killed every day down there. It is a war going on right here in our country. I am waiting for him to acknowledge it! 12 kidnappings a day. People burnt alive, put in acid, in tunnels and held, they come over from Larado and he gave Mexico billions of dollars and helicopters, armory, surveilance cameras. That is how the taliban started al-gaeda. We needed that on our border! What is he doing?
I have always like him but now I have serious -I hope misunderstandings of him. I have serious doubts now though.
2007-12-02 08:59:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Lincoln was hated in his day as well. So was Reagan. Both are beloved and cherished by so many, including this grateful American.
Bush will eventually be regarded as one of the greats. The lack of attacks on US soil since 9/11 is only one reason.
2007-12-02 16:36:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by LastNerveLost 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Patti Jo, what answer could possibly be illegal? I assume you are saying that Bush has stripped away some freedom you used to enjoy but can't now. What specifically is it? The right to post silly remarks to a global audience certainly isn't it.
Bush will be remembered as a great president in a critical time. This would not have been true had his silly amnesty bill made it through.
2007-12-02 08:06:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Freedom Guy 4
·
5⤊
4⤋
I'm glad to see you put President in front of his name. I think he is a good President who is hated because he won the elections fair and square, and Dem's could not take it. He has over come so many problems left by the Clinton era. The only thing I am not in agreement with Pres Bush is illegals creeping in and using up our resources without giving back to our country. I think immigration problems are deeper than we know, and Bill Clinton started the problem without following through the one page immigration applications handed out daily through out his administration. What a creep.
2007-12-02 08:17:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by powerdoll 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
Worst president ever!
2007-12-02 13:50:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
HE is the worst president ever in USA History. He is a copy of his dad. He plunged the nation into the most unneccessary and bloody war. Many American families are losing their kids every day to this war. He along with many other politicans need to put their money where their mouths are...and send their own children to fight in the war.
2007-12-02 08:22:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by ooops1970 2
·
3⤊
4⤋