Which would you rather watch and why?
2007-12-02 07:54:11 · 17 answers · asked by brickity hussein brack 5 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
All of them at the same time.
2007-12-02 07:57:20 · answer #1 · answered by I hate Jeff Hardy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL, Now that is funny, I seen someone say the WWE divas are better wrestlers.
Oh thats a good one. The WWE divas are just for show other than maybe 3 of them. Gail Kim, Jackie Moore, Angel Williams (Angelina Love in TNA), Talia Madison (Velvet Sky in TNA), ODB are all fantastic wrestlers. Christy Hemme has more talent than most of the current wwe divas. Christy was only fired from the wwe because Stephanie McMahon is stupid. The women in TNA (even though the division just started) will put on far better matches than the wwe will.
2007-12-02 08:38:05 · answer #2 · answered by komets.geo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Helloooo are we forgetting that these 'knockouts' are WWE rejects? Gail Kim? Reject!...Jackie Moore...Reject! Christy Hemme (who by the way also posed in playboy) WWE reject, Shelly Martinez, heck even ODB was in the WWE training territory. All rejects people! They obviously aren't talented enough to be in the big leagues!
I don't get how anyone can say that the WWE divas are less talented than the TNA knockouts. WWE has Victoria, Beth Phoenix, Mickie James, Melina Perez, Michelle McCool, Jillian Hall not to mention people like Candice Michelle (who is really improving on her skills) on their roster. These wpmen in my opinion are way more talented than some of those chicks on TNA.
2007-12-02 10:24:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All at the same time is a good answer. Like MOST people, I like the divas when they show some skin and sexuality which is why they are there. Very few people watch female wrestling for the same reason as they watch mens wrestling- it is about T and A- sex sells and whenever they've tried to take that out of the womens division it has suffered in popularity
2007-12-02 08:08:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather watch the knockouts. They have better gimmicks and can actually wrestle. I think the Divas are cuter but if I want to watch a woman wrestle it would be the knockouts.
2007-12-02 08:14:56 · answer #5 · answered by FionaLeona 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WWE Divas. They are good wrestlers. Yes they have looks, but their not juss pretty faces. If their just lil miss playboy's then why don't u guys become WWE Divas. They are talented and put their bodies on the line. I'm gonna follow in their foot steps. Juss cuz some choose 2 pose 4 Playboy doesn't mean their not bad a**es. U guyz r juss jealous.
2007-12-02 08:09:59 · answer #6 · answered by wrestling lover 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Divas, just to laugh at how bad the majority of them wrestle
2007-12-02 08:13:12 · answer #7 · answered by Madina 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
On looks AND wrestling ability... Gail Kim.
Otherwise Divas.
2007-12-02 08:37:07 · answer #8 · answered by Layeth thy smacketh down 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The TNA knockouts are bad actors and skanky lookin, the WWE divas are better wrestlers so I'll say the WWE divas
2007-12-02 07:57:57 · answer #9 · answered by leilanixlucifer 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
i think the tna knockouts are better wrestlers ...but i wud rather ***** the wwe divas
2007-12-02 08:09:44 · answer #10 · answered by PIPEBOMB 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE had a good womens division Trish, Lita, Stacy, Jazz , Sable ect. Now the knockouts are better. They have one of the most talented womens wrestlers out there in Gail Kim, who frankly wwe should have held on to.
2007-12-02 07:57:46 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋