Do you support genetically modified food?

Question

Which companies produce GM products?

Answer 1

no way. It is a huge problem and people are very ignorant of the dire effects it has on our health and our earth.

Answer 2

Yes. Over 50% of the wheat, corn and soy is already modified.The world population has topped 6 billion people, and is predicted to double in the next 50 years. Ensuring an adequate food supply for this booming population is going to be a MAJOR challenge. Genetically modified foods promise to meet this need, and without it ... the human race would die off. In the very near future, I really don't think anyone will have a choice in the matter ... genetically modified food, or death by starvation.

Answer 3

In a be conscious, definite. i'm a PhD candidate analyzing plant/pathogen interactions. I even have assisted in designing a number of plant lines that are seen GMO's and have participated in debates approximately their protection. In an amlost wide-unfold consistent, the utilising stress in the back of the wide-unfold public concept of GMO's is lack of understanding. I even have tried to communicate with individuals of the Sierra club with regards to the technologies that is going into those products, although that's impossible because of the fact they have not got any concept what that's that we do. To many anti-GMO factions their purely argument is that nature knows ultimate. nicely we've been changing nature because of the fact the dawn of agriculture, that's only now that we are able to influence those ameliorations in a centred way. An before post stated using the 35S CaMV promoter, how many here certainly understand what that's? how many are assuming that because of the fact it comes from a virus it may be undesirable? The 35S promoter would not encode for any proteins, it facilitates to change the value of expression of the downstream gene. that's a constitutive promoter, meaning that that's consistently in an "on" state, and as such any protein this is linked with it may additionally be expressed to a severe point. yet another before post stated that GMO's have decrease diet levels, that's not genuine. in certainty a number of GMO's have been engineered to supply greater levels of supplementations. For the main section the decreased micronutrient levels seen in cultivated produce could nicely be traced to the growth circumstances of the vegetation. For the main section nutrition is harvested till now it has a huge gamble to mature, and it "ripens" after harvest. This has enabled us to have strawberries interior the iciness (between different issues), even though it additionally decreased the final high quality of the produce. till now youtake components in a depate, ask your self, "Do i individually understand the themes handy?". in case you will not be able to respond to definite, than that's time to coach your self. in this be conscious that's imporant to collect data from the two components of the communicate. Trusting Greenpeace to supply you the full reality approximately a controversy is somewhat like trusting Monsanto. you ought to study the two components of an agrument. i can honestly say that I understand genetic ameliorations extra advantageous than ninety 9.9% of the inhabitants, or maybe i ought to examine my supplies on occasion.

Answer 4

I don't even touch food that have been genetically modified. Lab mice wouldn't even eat that crap.

Answer 5

No, not at all. I like naturally grown, organic foods.

Answer 6

If that's what there is to eat, yes. I have no idea who is doing it.

Answer 7

I don't even know what it is LOL!

Answer 8

no i dont