Clinton:
- Floundering phony who hasn't run so much as a bake sale.
Guiliani:
- "America's Mayor". Not only did he hold together one of the largest cities in the world after that horrible tragedy brought on by those camel-humpers, but he cleaned up said city. The crime rate was significantly lower, and the city itself was just cleaner.
2007-12-02 09:09:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by zippythejessi 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
i don't like each of the canidates.... I basically want the wide-spread to be over to work out who're the reliable applicants... Hilary... no longer the finest.. human beings say the clinton admin change into sturdy yet i do not want issues to be a similar before bush got here in... i want an intensive replace... In clintons presidential years there have been no longer sufficient substantial ameliorations that you'll genuinely see contained in the international... the in basic terms reason she is ahead contained in the polls is with the aid of her call... thats it.... no longer because she has reliable political evaluations its basically the call.... WTF she had suggested definite to the conflict efforts when we all started and then everybody says, we were incorrect.... the position is the guy that suggested no from the start??? the college software the clintons did FAILED miserably and Ross Perot suggested NO and wager what he change into properly!!! Guiliani... similar no longer the the finest... the in basic terms reason human beings like him a lot is the only incident that he managed 9-11.... What else has he finished??? did he make any regulations or judgements... the in basic terms reason I see him operating for president is for better fulfillment... he not in any respect spoken to any political leaders except his personal commitee... i do not imagine he can communicate over with the overseas diplomats, he hasn't ever finished this and he's attempting to run for president??? The conflict he'd be for it like bush.. because that he probable has the 9-11 itch.. attempting to guard the rustic..
2016-10-25 07:59:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by novielli 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, I lean more to the Democratic party than the Republican so that should be known up front. Now, that being said, I really dont like either one. And I dont think either of them will end up with the nomination.
With Clinton, you either "love" her or you "hate" her. I dont think she really has the where with all to be president. I am not comfortable wth her views on a variety of issues and I think sometimes she is preaching what that particular group wants to hear.
As for Guilani, if it wasnt for 9/11, he would be an average candidate at best. Talking to relatives and friends in NYC, he was not even a fair mayor. I cannot seeing the Republicans ending up with him. I think they will find a more middle right candidate to carry their banner
2007-12-02 07:46:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by carlt 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
While I'm not sold on Guiliani, Hillary wil be this country's worst nightmare. She has no experience, and most importantly, she has no ethics or morals.
Forget everything she is saying now, she will as close to a socialist president as we've ever had.
2007-12-02 07:42:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by NCO77 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Guilani is ine verb 911 and an adjective
Clinton is the whole package. Knowledge, Experience and strong presonality
2007-12-02 08:55:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by sligoman 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
They are both snakes in the grass and they are both slipping in the polls...thank God the people are seeing them for what they are.
PS...if those two are your friends' favorites...you need better educated friends.
2007-12-02 07:34:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
I'll sum both of them up in just one word for you.
JOKES!!!!!!
2007-12-02 07:38:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
they have the same globalist agenda
2007-12-02 07:33:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋