2007-12-02 07:02:44 · 4 answers · asked by irish dubliner 2 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Desktops
hi mate
both these chipsets are popular with manufacturers as they are inexpensive to use with notebooks and do a good job of running laptop and desktop displays at adequate resolutions
both these video adapter use pixel and shader model 2.0 and are direct x 9.0c compliant
the Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator 950 has the following specifications..........................
256-bit graphics core running at 400MHz
Up to 10.6 GB/sec memory bandwidth with DDR2 667 system memory
1.6 GPixels/sec and 1.6 GTexels/sec fill rate
Up to 224 MB maximum video memory
2048x1536 at 75 Hz maximum resolution
Dynamic Display Modes for flat-panel, wide-screen and Digital TV support
Operating systems supported: Microsoft Windows* XP, Windows* XP 64bit, Media Center Edition 2004/2005, Windows 2000; Linux-compatible (Xfree86 source available)
this is compared to the Mobile Intel® 945GM Express Chipset which can be found at http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/945gm/
however the difference between these chipsets is so small theres no real difference that could be noticed
good luck mate !
2007-12-02 08:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by brianthesnail123 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
u wanna get a motherboard
with this sort of chipset for games
the link below for intel 775
http://microdirect.co.uk/(26681)Gigabyte-GAN650SLIDS4L-motherboard-nForce.aspx
the link below for am2 athlon
http://microdirect.co.uk/(17594)Gigabyte-motherboard-GAM55SS3-nForce-550.aspx
theyl both b alright tho also the company is brilliant
i hope this helps also really good compny ad to ur favourites
2007-12-02 08:12:28 · answer #2 · answered by nathaniel l 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not much difference as they are both not able to deal with heavy graphics usage.
2007-12-02 07:06:37 · answer #3 · answered by Cupcake 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not very much difference at all.
2007-12-02 07:11:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋