English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

I love the global warming alarmists. It's not the temperature it's the climate. At what point does the temperature come into play? When it's most convenient I assume. The alarmists can't be wrong because everything is a product of global warming. The heat, the early snow. The drastic hurricanes, the lack of hurricanes. They've got a sweet deal where they can't be wrong.

2007-12-02 06:58:48 · answer #1 · answered by Splitters 7 · 4 1

Human induced global warming is a joke. Liberals now believe any weather change proves it. There is no proof of warming or human factors in warming, it's all consensus science. Look up online and read Michael Crichton's article on global warming (Aliens cause global warming or something like that).

As long as it results in loss of freedom for the individual, liberals will support it. Go Socialism!

Hahahah, Al Gore's "Assault on Reason" must be a biography.

2007-12-02 06:49:16 · answer #2 · answered by Freedom Guy 4 · 3 0

What Al Gore said is that global warming will change the PATTERNS of weather, he didn't imply that the weather will just get warmer and warmer. And an early snowfall indicates a change in pattern, right?

And if you want to knock Al Gore...just think for a minute about how different a world it would be right now if he had been allowed to claim the election he actually won by popular vote.
Just think how many people would not have died in this terribly mistaken, terribly tragic war.

Read "The Assault on Reason" by Al Gore. Do yourself a favor and actually watch "An Inconvenient Truth".

2007-12-02 06:46:17 · answer #3 · answered by Mary K 2 · 0 3

Floods! Fires! Early Winters! Long Summers. It all points to the dreaded Global Warming.

Earlier this year, San Diego had terrible wildfires. It was vindication for our side. This fire proves the dire threat of Global Warming, which is a direct product of Bush's environmental terrorism.

You see, when the temperature graphs and other information didn't quite substantiate the theory of man-made global warming, we realized the phenomena was even more insidious than we previously imagined. Hence, we changed the term to "climate change". This can refer to the climate getting hotter or colder in parts of the world, wetter or dryer.

This San Diego catastrophe proves that Mother Earth is trying desperately to correct the severe imbalances that man's relentless attacks on her have wrought. She has made the earth dry and barren, and is now wiping it clean with the purity of fire. All hail Mother Earth.

Since Global Warming (GW) is being so viciously attacked by narrow-minded scientists who stubbornly point out the temperature records don't support GW, we are now emphasizing the change in weather patterns. You know what place must be the center of GW? Chicago, Illinois !! They have a saying there, "If you don't like the weather, just wait ten minutes. It will change."

Interestingly, records show this has been going on for centuries! Chicago must be like the epicenter of this disaster. Even hundreds of years ago, Chicago had changeable weather patterns. I believe we can fault the savage Indians and their evil, farting buffalo.

Don't mock GW. I have a theory. In order for Mother Earth to survive, she's going to use every resource at her disposal to lower planetary temperature. Pretty soon, ithere will be ice storms and snow in Miami. Who should we blame? All the people who didn't listen to the dire threat of Global Warming.

2007-12-02 07:09:56 · answer #4 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 3 3

Al Gore should stick to preaching at African American churches. At least he is good at that. He has the cadence and accent down and he be down with the brother man.

2007-12-02 06:43:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

You should stick to politics

You have the following problem like most Americans: you do not understand anything about statistics, standard variation, etc...

One point outside a range is NOT enough to prove a general trend wrong.

2007-12-02 06:39:33 · answer #6 · answered by NLBNLB 6 · 0 3

Read this slowly. Please. I'm tired of repeating myself to the ignorant masses.

Global warming doesn't refer to each day being the warmest on record. It refers to the AVERAGE temperature of the earth increasing.

An average is when you add up all of something and then divide it by how many there are- like for instance the temperature of each day added up for a year, divided by 365 will give you the average temperature for the year.

Snow will still fall.

Your argument is akin to saying "there's no terrorist attacks in Spokane, WA today- guess there is no terrorism!"

Kind of stupid, huh?

2007-12-02 06:39:26 · answer #7 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 1 4

Hey! Don't knock Al!

Very few people can have a $1,200 per month electric bill and still succesfully convince people that they are the pontiff of environmental stewardship.

2007-12-02 06:35:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Naw, hes good for comedic relief. Also his recent Noble Prize showed to me how irrelevant these types of awards actually are. He serves a purpose, just not the one that hed like to.

2007-12-02 06:37:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

Ask your grandkids as they leave you behind to die so they can walk further north in the hope they might find water in the repKon hell cheneybush are making of the earth.

2007-12-02 06:43:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers