How Stupid is it to think (2) 6 ton titanium engines would not leave a dent in the Pentagon at 500+ MPH?

Question

Apparently the 9/11 bush supporters think that (2) 6 ton engines wouldNOT EVEN Break the Windows on both sides of the entry hole.

That perfect little circular shaped hole that entered the building.

The Wings broke off they say -- Okay we can accept that

Why were the Windows besides the entry hole still intact??

Did those (2) 6 ton engines BOUNCE OFF THE BUILDING?
Without leaving a Dent?
Did they just vanish and dissolve into a puff of smoke?

Any intelligent person would see that (2) 6 ton engines crashing in at 500+ MPH would be able to crack windows at least, and leave an indentation?

Can someone please explain to me how the public should accept these flexible Laws of Physics

500+ MPH
6 TON ENGINES

Someone explan this to me intelligently please

IF YOU REPORT MY QUESTIONS I ONLY REPOST THEM AGAIN AND AGAIN

Answer 1

Check with your psychic!

Answer 2

You are obviously infamiliar with the testing done involving aircraft hitting concrete walls.

This test was performed at the Sandia National Laboratories in 1992: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--_RGM4Abv8 Please note that the only identifiable pieces are the wingtips, which were past the edges of the concrete.

This page has more on that and on an incident involving a C-130 transport that hit an apartment building in Azari, Iraq in 2005:
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/crashdebris.html
It also has a link to more video of the F-4 test if you follow the video gallery link.

Aircraft that hit concrete walls at 480 MPH are shredded, including the engines.

Answer 3

You raised several questions at once which are answered as follows:

CLAIM: Engines were made out of titanium & shouldn’t have broken
FACT: The engines were not stamped out of a solid block of titanium

Instead, engines are intricate assemblies of thousands of parts that are welded or joined together by fasteners. Yes, some of the pieces were titanium. In hitting reinforced concrete, the engines were smashed apart. This is what happens all the time in plane crashes

Greg Feith, former senior investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), says this (utter destruction) is typical. Feith says that in 1997, a high speed plane crash In Sumatra left nothing more than a tire carcass and engine-parts the size of a pot lid. (Pop. Mech., “Debunking 9/11,” p. 87-88). Notice what he said about the engine.
-------------------------------------------------------
CLAIM The building around the hole were not charred or damaged.

FACT: Claims that the walls of the Pentagon, around the hole, were not scarred, are absurd and are simple falsehoods.

Just click on the following link to see “The Pentagon Building Performance Report,” which is the official investigation by the American Society of Civil Engineers” (they’re NOT affiliated with the government)

http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

The following color photos can be seen:

Fig 5.9 shows huge area of charring on the Pentagon face
Fig 5.11 shows debris scars south of the hole
Fig 5.12 shows gashes in the wall from the right wing
Etc, etc.
-----------------
CLAIM: Windows didn't break
FACT: Some of the windows had been upgraded to resist blast and some of these, off to the side, did not break. The conventional windows near the crash all broke. So what?

To see color photos of this, just click on the following link to see “The Pentagon Building Performance Report,” which is the official investigation by the American Society of Civil Engineers” (they’re NOT affiliated with the government)

http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

Fig 5.14 shows intact upgraded windows
Fig 5.15 shows damaged conventional windows.

Just as you’d expect.
----------------------------
CLAIM: The hole the plane made in the pentagon is too small & round.
FACT: This is explained by Professor Mere Sozen, a “Kettelhut Distinguished Professor Civil Engineering” at Perdue University.

Professor Sozen says that it’s the energy of the plane, not its size, that determines the size of the hole.

The plane is not a cartoon character that punches out its outline. Moving at 531 MPH it’s more fluid than solid, & this explains why you get the hole you got.

See how Prof Sozen used supercomputers to analyze the impact at:
http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
--------------------------
CLAIM: Security tapes were not released
FACT: Yes they were

In March of 2002, five frames of video footage from a Pentagon Security camera were released & you can see them here:

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/fiveframes.html

On May 16, 2006, the Department of Defense revealed footage from two video cameras, which you can observe here:

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/dodvideos.html

Footage from the nearby Citgo gas station was released on September 15, 2006, and you can view it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk

I understand that the video from the Sheraton Hotel really didn’t show anything, but I don’t have a link for it.
------------
Hope this helps.

Answer 4

The one that I like is, You would need a football field full of people to execute a plan like that but 19 men and about 5 more from a cave executed it with perfection.

I know government is bad but 24 people can execute a mission better that a 30,000 seats football field full of government workers... we are in trouble.

Answer 5

You were reported, to who? Yahoo? Who is Yahoo, are they compiling lists of "good and bad questions"?

Yahoo has "community guidelines" and a point reward system for participation in the Question and Answer section of their website. Persons are required to agree with their "community guidelines" and be exposed to repercussions for not following guidelines as determined by an "unknown" entity.

This is a good question; the DOD has a fax #, consider sending them the question aside from posting here, please, an answer would be nice to hear.

The temporary representatives who wrote the 9-11 Commissions Report--some of them no longer hold office due to expiration of terms. The questions need to have a Department which to refer to, now and in the future.

Dear Poster, Force Mass and Acceleration;
You realize perhaps that any group of persons who investigates these issues and that is not affiliated with a Government agency, or that is not endorsed by a Government agency will come under intense scrutiny by persons who may attempt to label them as "conspiracy theorists".

Some of the issues associated with the attrocities of that day are quite difficult to pursue just in concept, as well as with limited communication via the internet.

Answer 6

If they would release the various videos they confiscated that show exactly what flew into the Pentagon, it would put a lot of this speculation to rest.

Answer 7

Your tone is offensive.

Don't forget, you want to claim that GW Bush (who you believe is the dumbest man in the world) concocted a scheme to fool the entire world of Engineers and Physicists, AND HAS DONE SO, except for you.

Ever wonder why we doubt?

Answer 8

I went to pre-heat my bbq grill, and the damn thing collapsed at free-fall speed (-10%) into its own footprint!

Then my old grill, 2 blocks away did the same thing! And I wasn't even pre-heating it!!

So I ordered out.