These guys break into this man's house to rob him, the man pulls out a shotgun and kills the robber with the gun, but he then proceeds to force the other robber at gunpoint to have sex with the body of his slain comrade while he videotapes it. Will the homeowner be held liable , will the remaining robber still be charged with crime?
2007-12-02 04:40:07 · 6 answers · asked by that guy 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It's going to be hard to convince the Courts that the victim in a robbery actually did this!! The robber will have to have proof of this to get the victim arrested or convicted. Yes the robber will still be convicted of the crime he commited, there's no way out of that. The robber will have a hard time convincing the Courts that this actually happened therefore he really needs the proof of this, but it dosen't mean it will get him out of the robbery charge. This is quite weird!! I guess that's what he gets for doing the crime, you just never know!!!!!
2007-12-02 04:49:17 · answer #1 · answered by 24Special 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, he did not injury human beings. the individuals injury themselves. in case you yell hearth in a theater, then you are the malicious contributing instigator for panic and mayhem. You knew there became into not hearth and you yelled hearth besides out of malicious purpose. Harold truly believed what he became into asserting for some reason. there became into no panic. No mobs. No stampede. All there became into have been stupid people who have been too damn lazy to do any learn themselves. Like making an investment your existence discounts in an exterior miniture golf direction on the north pole and not doing any learn how to locate that it is so chilly up there which you would be able to not stay exterior long adequate to play. the actual Christians have been people who knew that he became into crammed with it because of the fact Christians understand that no one will ever understand the day of the 2d coming and that we've been ordered to not even attempt to make certain.
2016-10-10 02:02:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think if you did that you would end up in a mental institution. What you are suggesting has nothing to do with self defense and would actually make the whole incident to seem like the act of a nut case.
2007-12-02 04:43:52 · answer #3 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Umm I think the other robber would also be splatter on the wall if were my choice. No witnesses and no one alive to prosecute.
2007-12-02 04:44:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. the one crime has nothing to do with the other. we don't live in vigilante justice system, at least if you live in the US
and it won't be hard to show the 'victim' did this if you have the videotape
2007-12-02 04:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by qb 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing wrong with abusing criminals, just don't get caught with evidence.
2007-12-02 04:43:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋