BLOODTHIRSTY BOTH?
2007-12-02 03:51:07 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
One is dead ,the other is alive.
2007-12-02 03:56:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
This is possibly the stupidest question I've ever heard, topped only by some of the stupidest answers. Any of you over the age of 15, should be ashamed of yourselves for even joking about this.
You might want to look at a history book from time to time, and if you do, you might discover that Hitler was truly an evil human being.
Compare what you read with your so called complaints against Bush. (you need to compare them with real things though, not what you've read on the loony left web sites).
God forbid, that we ever have someone like Hitler in the USA, the nut cases will be the first eliminated. Maybe in those final seconds, even the most ignorant of you will have a moment of clarity.
2007-12-02 15:59:12 · answer #2 · answered by NCO77 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hitler embraced a large national health care system.
Bush doesn't.
Hitler embraced a large national welfare system.
Bush doesn't.
Hitler embraced harsh & strict controls of business & Commerce.
Bush doesn't.
Hitler embraced profound intervention by the government in employment in the private sector.
Bush doesn't.
Hitler embraced outlawing the priavte ownership of firearms.
Bush doesn't.
To me this all sounds disturbingly familiar but these are facts.
2007-12-02 13:36:47 · answer #3 · answered by Albannach 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure Hitler didn't cause any cases of Hitler Derangement Syndrome. Bush, on the hand as evidenced by your question and the first answer.....
2007-12-02 11:56:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hitler was not a true leader. He was a populist who specialized in propoganda. Bush could care less about polls and what people think about him. You may not agree, however that is a trait of a true leader. History will Judge Bush as one of the great Presidents, because peoples opinions did not matter. That kind of personality trait scares most politicians. The man cannot be bought off like most of them. Think about it.
2007-12-02 12:11:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
A whole bunch of free thinking citizens; traditional Americans who will freely criticize any ideal that is not in tune with traditional values.
2007-12-02 12:07:56 · answer #6 · answered by dollysj 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hitler was an Austrian, who moved to Germany. He could speak and use the German language. His name was really Schikllegrubber or something like it. He did military service, for the bad guys, but he did it.
Good Ole Boy is born in America, and CAN'T speak American or use it. His name is really Bush, which is a small tree-like thing that doesn't move much, or think. He dodged his military service didn't he?
Seems clear, one though mad had a brain. (Of Sorts) The other might possibly have a tiny peanut, withered and de-salted.
One might as well ask "What is ht edifference between a cow poop and a horse poop?" Don't really matter it is all poop. Just like Bushy no-brain.
2007-12-02 12:05:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 7⤋
Difference would be that Hitler wasnt a traitor and did what he felt best for his country while Bush only thinks of himself,his buddies and Israel.
Bush likes oil and $$ while Hitler dont
2007-12-02 12:11:24 · answer #8 · answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5 · 6⤊ 5⤋
George W Bush is an elected leader who is doing what he believes is best for the country despite what a bunch of conspiracy theorists and mentally addled people think.
Hitler was a butcher who sought to exterminate entire races of people and tried conquer the world.
Your question shows how deranged the left wing extremists have become. I will laugh when the democrats are crushed in the upcoming election.
2007-12-02 12:01:44 · answer #9 · answered by The Man from Nowhere 3 · 4⤊ 6⤋
All you people are sick, read some history morons. This is an example of why the Democrats are hated so much now. I used to laugh at a certain talk show host who says "liberalism is a mental disorder", but now I think I agree with it. It is truly scary too see all the people on here who would validate such an ignorant comment even if it was in jest.
2007-12-02 11:58:21 · answer #10 · answered by El Guapo 4 · 6⤊ 7⤋
Hitler would have had you and your family shot for criticizing him. Since your still posting Bush Bashing garbage and are obviously alive to post drivel such as this about our President... I assume the hit sqaud hasnt arrived at your door yet to put a bullet in your melon.
Comparing Hitler to any sitting President, no matter how much you disagree with his policies is disgraceful.
2007-12-02 11:59:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 7⤋