What is a moral and immoral person? Does it really exist?

Question

Consider some would say oral sex is immoral just procreation is ok and definately not homosexuality. Others would consider murder is immoral. But then in such a case, would you consider a homosexual immoral if they contribute tremendously to the community? How about the WW2 heros, who murdered (trained to kill is murder. premeditated) yet saved the world then therefore are immoral? In my personal opinion since we are just human there are only immoral or moral acts not immoral or moral people. Agree?

Answer 1

Morals, and ethics, come to that, are strictly arbitrary concepts invented by humans to facilitate their interaction with each other. Without morals and ethics any kind of society could not function and would fall apart. Attributing these concepts to gods and religions made them more meaningful. Now it is almost universally accepted that morals, right and wrong, were delineated by god, and some people actually think that to be an atheist, you must be immoral. Lots of people, probably the majority, think that 'good' and 'evil' are entities, perpetually at war with each other. Not so! Fundamentally, we don't steal from each other or kill or hurt each other because we don't want the same being done to us. We don't want chaos and anarchy.
Homosexuality is accepted as bad or immoral simply because it is a dead-end. Theres is no 'future' in it.

Answer 2

A very interesting question my friend.

I think it definately depends on each individuals perception of immoral vs moral.

This could be dictated by many factors, religion, upbringing, peers, an individuals take on the world at large...

The things I find most immoral are not personal sexual choices (ie homosexuals/oral sex between consenting adults) but things that are most damaging to society and things that break people apart rather than bring them together.

My view is that humans are part of a greater thing, we evolved along with the world, we arent here to fight wars, we are here to procreate and nourish our environment by behaving peacefully and respecting our habitats - however, there are some people who want to cause war and there are also people who wish to put an end to its destruction....but this obviously causes the same turmoil and immorality by having to kill to save the world...

I think its mainly our ability to process thought that stops us from doing what we are naturally made for...we get caught up in emotions like fear, anger, hatred and love....

therefor, I do believe you are correct in saying that it is only the acts that are immoral...not the person becuase of the individuals perception of right and wrong

Answer 3

actually i agree with you totally up until your conclusion, which is where i believe the opposite.

morality, as you already said, is different to different people. there is not a single universal standard for morality. in some places, smiling at someone is an insult, and refusing to eat your father after his funeral & cremation would be a horribly shameful thing.

since morality can only exist within a religion or society, and society decides who is moral and who is immoral, there can be "moral" and "immoral" people within that society, however, there are no universally moral or immoral acts.

it's essentially all arbitrary.

Answer 4

Morality really belongs to the Zeitgeist, every individual can justify a seemingly abhorrent act in some way. It is only when we are judged by our peers that our actions and beliefs can be judged to be moral or immoral.

For example, a western liberal and moral thinker of 300 hundred years could very well have accepted slavery as a moral trade. It would be very hard to do so nowadays and be considered moral. Rightly so.

Answer 5

I don't agree with some of your examples. War comes under self defense, nor murder.

The moral person does the right thing for the right reason. Use the Golden Rule to figure out the right thing.

Answer 6

I certainly agree with you there are no moral or immoral people. In fact I would go further on to say that neither are acts or deeds immoral; it is the setting and the context that makes them so.

As you said, we are humans after all.

Answer 7

There is nothin' such as Moral or Immoral person everythin' lies in the Perception of the person , a thief might steal things thinkin' he is a modern day robinhood but police think he is a crook!

Answer 8

I tend to agree with you. Morals are learned behaviors, not hereditary ones. You can be taught to be a morally upstanding person, but peer pressure, society and circumstances can change that.

However, a person that continually displays immoral behavior is labelled as immoral, just as a person who displays irrational behavior is labelled a psycho. Neither is appropriate, but society has taught us this.

Answer 9

God would not want those with morals - He needs human beings, who're in touch interior of a non secular courting with Him because of the fact they see their want for Him. Jesus got here for the sinners - not the moral ! greater; IF God did not exist ... there could be no such element as ethical nor immoral. it somewhat is why immediately, on the instant, maximum folk stay like something is going, as contemplated interior of their existence-types, as a results of their loss of a non secular courting with God. the version between an Atheist and a Christian. is that God has chosen to bare Himself to specific human beings, to grow to be in touch with Him interior of a non secular courting, for this reason, making them Christian. Christians are in user-friendly terms human beings, who're maximum well known the "parade" - a "start up", you are able to say. Atheists are human beings, who're doing, in user-friendly terms what comes organic ! - it somewhat is all !!!

Answer 10

The moral majority is neither. This question will have different answers for different people. One persons morals may be totally the opposite of another persons.
Does it exist. yes and no.