Here's the question -- did the press spend one millionth as much time on Juanita Broderick's rape by Bill Clinton (and Hillary's subsequent scare tactics directed at Ms Broderick) then they do about this stupid Larry Craig incident?
2007-12-02 02:04:28 · 13 answers · asked by spicymnguy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Com'n so-called objective liberals...I'd like to hear from you
2007-12-02 02:13:51 · update #1
Ohio-- yet, they will highlight an article about Craig from 4 gay men without any supporting evidence.
Credibility? What a freakin joke
2007-12-02 02:15:12 · update #2
Yep Just Plain -- you're the type of liberal I'm talking about .....groan.
2007-12-02 02:17:56 · update #3
The press can get thousands of idiots to lie about this. Any nitwit wanting attention can spew unverifiable crap. It's sickening that the press would not only support the lies but even encourage it. Shame. The hell with truth and facts.
2007-12-02 06:23:00 · answer #1 · answered by NOT! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say that many more journalistic man hours were spent on investigating Juanita Broderick's claims and she was found to be not credible.
For goodness sake, she attended a fundraiser for Bill Clinton just three scant weeks later AND she never told her husband or any of her relatives that it happened, but the people she had in her life in 1998 had all been told twenty years earlier about the rape.
Sorry, that doesn't add up. I think she changed her story to receive either attention or hush money.
2007-12-02 02:18:01 · answer #2 · answered by susanmaried 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
hi Lioness, i attempted to locate "objectified" and "objectification" interior the dictionary and no excitement. nicely, i'm no longer precisely helpful I comprehend your queston, yet think of i might have an concept. besides, have you ever heard of the "bell curve"? it fairly is a curve it fairly is formed like a bell and does an excellent activity of representing documents. As for splendor, at one end of the curve we've the least captivating and on the different end the main. a similar may well be genuine for earnings ... poorest on one side and richest on the different. interior the midst of the bell we've all the common individuals. i think of what you're saying is genuine, yet in simple terms in simple terms a certainty of existence. we've the full spectrum for the two genders. As for why adult men do no longer protest ... i assume they comprehend that it fairly is in simple terms the way issues are and protests at the instant are not likely to alter something. desire this helps!
2016-09-30 10:44:05 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the press realized the Clinton allegations were the result of right wing zealots going ballistic and the Larry Craig incident is the result of duplicity at the extreme?
=========
How in the world you came to the conclusion I am a liberal is beyond me --------- one is the result of zealots the other is the result of duplicity. Now tell me, how did you come to your conclusion?
You heard it on smear radio?
Screw em, I've had it up to my armpits in smear radio on the right as well as the left.
========
I am a liberal, and damned proud of it, but for you to come to your conclusion when any such conclusion could not be made based on what I said, proves you wear your partisan beliefs on your sleeve.
Peace
Jim
.
2007-12-02 02:15:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
When I first heard about the pressure on Craig to resign, I wrote to him to urge him to thumb his nose at his party. Normally, I'm elated when a Republican has to resign in disgrace, but I prefer the reason to be related to some criminal perversion of the conservative aberration.
Is that the kind of liberal (radical, actually) response you trolls were looking for?
2007-12-02 02:48:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton was put under a microscope....the Republican extreme right are the ones trying to get rid of Craig
2007-12-02 02:41:15 · answer #6 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The press did cover her a bit more than that. But i agree with your point, Get to real news, lets see why Hillarys health care plan hasn't been introduced in congress these past 6 years, but its good enough to get her elected president.
2007-12-02 02:17:15 · answer #7 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Turn off the tv.
The American media has no credibility. Sex, celebrity gossip and missing white girls is all they have, ratings over substance.
Try some BBC.
2007-12-02 03:02:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
cause this is current news.....the clinton transgressions were years ago, and if the media didnt cover broderick it was probably because they didnt find here believeable. They didnt pull any punches with lewinsky, paula Jones, etc.
2007-12-02 02:13:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yep they always do. Anything that they feel will sell the press is going to harp on.
2007-12-02 02:08:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋