English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What i mean is - all the cures brought by science and medicine is after all the workings of God in man. Isn't?

2007-12-02 00:02:49 · 17 answers · asked by Third P 6 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Have a great day.

2007-12-02 00:04:01 · update #1

17 answers

As a person who's survived several medical issue's that I wasn't supposed to. I would have to say that medical and psychiatric science is defiantly God working through man. God has given every one the ability to help their fellow humans, it's up to us how we use that ability. I also think that there are angels here on earth that do God's work, how else would things get done Since God is not here in person, There are people who are His liaisons on earth. Science is just God, way of improving the world and the health of His people.

2007-12-02 00:59:26 · answer #1 · answered by Kathryn R 7 · 2 2

Maybe so... the non-existence of God can't be proved any more than the existence, so if there is a God that works through man then all the cures etc could be just that, because he made everything.... but in that case, all the diseases and evils of the world are also made by God, but God is perfect, in which case the evils can't be made by him, so they must be made by something else, but if God made everything he must have made the thing which makes the evils, but God is perfect so he can't make anything which can make evil, but we can make evil...so therefore God can't have made us, in which case all the cures brought about by science and medicine can't be the workings of God in man!

2007-12-04 07:37:37 · answer #2 · answered by davy j 2 · 0 0

If god in in all of us and we use science then we could say there is a tenuous connection, but science generally involves things that are based on knowledge rather than faith, and therefore has little to do with a Christian God exept for what nature might tell of a possible creator.

Science is concerned with things we can know or proove.

There are many things in the nature that science is concerned with. If the things in the natural world tell us something about the supernatural such as God and heaven, then science "sort of" has something to do with God.

So far noone has proven that the God of the Christians exists. There is some evidence that something like God might exist (e.g. Smolin's "baby universes") but most things to do with gods are superstition or speculation.

Many scientists look down on theoretical and metaphysical sciences that border on areas of faith.

2007-12-02 09:30:16 · answer #3 · answered by Graham P 5 · 2 0

The first cause of everything is unknowable. God as subject is a notion for first cause and is shared in many peoples. What is understood as autonomy or will becomes as a conception as a self aware need for self control. It is imposed in biological necessity but accepted as self positive on its realization. A bad parent could make it negative. External negativity stimulates the Judgment into existence and acts on the here-now stimulus. The there-then is a later development for which is used to conceive the first cause notion. Empiricism strictly adhered to self notion for autonomy rejects abstraction for its logical process for categorical sense and cause descriptions and uses there-then only in the future tense for its planning process, experimentation and how-there hypothesis formulation. In psychology, how-there hypothesis for the first cause notion may necessitate its relevancy when describing individual psychology: rational differentiation.

The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.

2007-12-02 14:14:29 · answer #4 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 1 0

If God is so perfect why did he make the garden such a mess till I came along to give a hand?

2007-12-02 02:30:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Do you mean that God works through secondary causes?

2007-12-02 00:36:18 · answer #6 · answered by Timaeus 6 · 3 0

Yes. I never understand people who cannot accept science and God as being compatible or one. Why does it have to be this or that? It seems ridiculous to me. And also, closed-minded.

2007-12-02 03:55:36 · answer #7 · answered by Marguerite 7 · 2 1

Only those who have no creative imagination, credit everything to god. For instance, crediting god for giving us brains to think, doesn't everyone get one of those?

2007-12-02 06:46:41 · answer #8 · answered by phil8656 7 · 0 0

If god created earth and everything in it then i suppose everything you have mentioned could be the workings of god.......its all a matter of what you beleive......soemthing we shall never know for sure.
Question....if all these things are the workings of god, why didnt he invent them when he created the earth in the first place?

2007-12-02 00:13:48 · answer #9 · answered by Slinky 3 · 1 2

You are 100% right! Some folks would prefer to leave God out of everything and declare, "Look what I have done!", but fail to realize God gave them the smarts to do it.

2007-12-02 00:11:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers