I am very much in favor of Hillary Clinton.....disappearing from public life forever.
2007-12-01 19:52:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by missingora 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Well I guess that we are in agreement on this issue. I don't think that a woman should ever be the President of the United States of America. Although I haven't been keeping up with the Presidential candidates at this point I'm disappointed with our options. I still am shocked that Americans seem to not really care that Mr. Obama was the only one who wouldn't put his hand over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance or made a statement by refusing to wear an American flag pendant. I honestly cannot comprehend how it is that these people are still in the running. I seriously would rather pick some obscure high school dropout with some common sense and an understanding of what right and wrong. I feel that President Bush missed the mark in that he refused to address the real war which is being fought right here on U.S. soil which is the cultural war. I am now an American Independent, and I feel that America should send a message by voting for some average Joe instead of a career politician. I truly feel that we would be better off. But in reality it isn't the President that makes America who she is, it’s the Americans that decide who America is. God Bless America, but please America give the Good Lord a reason to do so.
2007-12-01 20:03:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gabriel 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
NO,..and watch how you use communism,..a true communist government is the only government on this planet that will fix all of societies issues and synchronicities,..have you ever heard of no taxation w/o representation, well democracy is a farce and full of 'donkey' and 'elephant' doodoo,..with that being said, the department of agriculture should be doing well,..these politicians talk about the rich and the middle class, but there is a lower income proletariate here that if this government had any backbone, would move with choler against the corporatist entity to give its citizens living wages, but no, the politicians need to pad their pockets with our tax dollars and they are supposed to work for us,..we must read our country's founding documents, we have already had one revolutionary war and there has been an internal civil war,..no person in their right mind would vote for this woman,..so i will settle for the huckabee/tancredo ticket,..
i e a e,..
unificationist,..
2007-12-01 20:16:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by unificationist 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush saved lives? By sending us to war with a country that had nothing to do with 9-11!?! Ok
I am for Clinton.
She can't be communist- as communism is the absence of government (read the Communist Manifest by Karl Marx).
As for the health care -- I don't see people in England, France, Germany, Scandinavia or Canada all up in arms over free health care for their people; talk to people from there and do some research -- at least you know your taken care of and don't face insurance costs and denials for treatments because some insurance company decides your treatment is 'unnecessary' -- when the doctor says it will be safer and save your life.
People fear taxes -- but we don't fear debt and credit card bills ??-- or borrowing money from China (a 'Communist' country) to pay for this war !!
2007-12-01 19:28:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Hollister 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Clinton did try but was not sucessful. Here's a little info on the war to which we can give credit to G.W. Over 560 billion dollars spent so far and the number increases everyday on this war. 3,870 dead American Service members. 50,000 more severly maimed and disabled. And then Bush cut funding to the VA Hospitals. But his friend and our Vice President (Cheney-Halliburton) have made millions of dollars off this war. 6,000 American Iraq war veterans have commited suicide since 2003. And we have killed 600,000 Iraqi's. Who knows how many maimed and disabled. So maybe, just maybe when Hillary & Bill get them all home maybe some of those billions could be spent on health care for our people.
2007-12-01 19:30:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
"It's clear to many people these days that everything about Hillary is fake.........her (double)talk, her actions, the situations that suddenly arise for her etc. She'll lose a lot of votes. She might even end up only 3rd in Iowa. If that happens, she won't end up winning New Hampshire either. It'll be all downhill for her. People now realize her nationwide unfavourability factor of nearly 50% means she has no chance whatsoever of winning the Presidency, even IF she barely manages to scrape through the Primaries."
2007-12-01 20:12:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Din2600 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hmm, it seems to me that you are sadly one of the 30% or less that is actually for Bush. You poor decieved soul. Anyway. I am not sure if I am for Hilary. She definatly has much more experience than Obama, but i do believe that you are wrong about the 9/11 compared to the war thing. 1st of all 9/11 and the "war on terrorism"(aka the war for oil) have nothing to do with eachother. Its sad to think that someone as stupid as our president could have pursuaded you into thinking that he went into Iraq because of the terrorism factor. Iraq was our friend at one point in time, then george bush senior went over there to protect the oil and thats when it all went down hill. G.W.B came into the office with an agenda, finish hat his daddy started, and 9/11 landed in his hands, he then took this as an oppourtunity to go to the middle east and fight terrorism in Afganastan and then slowly move over to Iraq, because of the "weapons of mass destruction", which never existed. So he got us all ther. And now he has us stuck in this country and we are gaining hate from them, to a point where if we do pull out we suffer of having them come back to fight us, and yahh they have everyright to want to do that, because we jut invaded their country. So yes, I think that Hilary Clinton would be a great and needed replacement for George Bush, heck I would make a great replacement for goerge bush. Goerge Bush doesnt save lives, he is slowly depleating the american race because of his ignorance! You need to do some more reseach buddy!
2007-12-01 19:36:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by sam 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
No.
no experience
no solid positions
no integrity
no respect for our republic
no positive senatorial actions
she is a dud
2007-12-02 07:15:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To the long winded guy Sam . If you haven't noticed Bush ain't runnin
I doubt the Hildabeast will even make the nomination
2007-12-02 02:52:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I was till I found out all about what Ron Paul is trying to do. Go to FreeMe.tv- its a great website with all kinds of videos about him and his approach.
VOTE FOR RON PAUL!!
2007-12-01 20:30:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋