English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

I remember the story of the three little pigs "I'll huff and puff and blow your house down..."

But in fact wooden houses are
- Cheaper to build (Timber available easily)
- Cheaper to heat
- Easier to build

On the other hand, brick and mortar houses cost a lot more money.

Amazingly, 99% of the houses i saw in India are made of bricks, cement and wood. No house is of wood alone. I was wondering...

... truly surprised!

2007-12-01 19:22:31 · answer #1 · answered by Robin A 1 · 2 0

well in the last few years they have been doing something new. they are taking old shipping containers putting them together and then framing them in to houses. i seen this on Bob Villa that home improvement show. very cool and weather
resistant

2007-12-02 09:52:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

wood is light flies away and if it collapses the underneath it gives less damage to the humans also it is stonger in architecture patterns

2007-12-02 03:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

your question has to be why are there no foundations for the houses instead of change in material for the houses.

2007-12-02 03:36:11 · answer #4 · answered by human 2 · 0 0

because it's cheap. Most people don't have the money. No matter how much it will cost later, it's about the money now

2007-12-02 03:18:05 · answer #5 · answered by Jeffery H K 6 · 0 0

for the same reason you take " old cars " instead of cadi'es or lincolns to a demolition derby. __ cheaper to replace, and its expected to happen again.

2007-12-02 03:18:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because cardboard sucks even worse.

2007-12-02 03:16:04 · answer #7 · answered by tovey_mark 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers