My question seems to have made things (no apostrophe required)! It has nothing to do with plurals. It has to do with possession or ownerships(as in Peter's book )etc. or where there is a letter missing ( as in "it's" -instead of "it is" but NOT in " the dog lost its toy"(don't me why!) and most definately not for quotation marks which look like this " ". I don't (do not) think text speak is anything to do with it because I text and understand it's (it is)different. An apostrophe can change the meaning of things and how can it be "lazy"to put an apostophe in where there shouldn't be one? Like the menus: chip's, pea's...the chip's what? You are insinutatin that the chip owns something. I'd I had better give in as I seem to be in the minority ..There must be someone out there who's had English grammar lessons!
2007-12-01
19:03:20
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Nip
2
in
Education & Reference
➔ Words & Wordplay