Well, the problem as stated cannot be proven. If a/b = c/d, there is no rational number between them.
But I guess you really mean something like this:
Given a, b, c, d are all integers,
AND that a/b does not equal c/d,
prove that:
there exists a rational number x, such that
x > a/b
AND
x < c/d.
So all you have to do is find some number that's definitely in between a/b and c/d. An obvious candidate is the average of a/b and c/d.
The average is defined as the sum divided by the number of things you're averaging.
The average of 5 and 7 is 6. The average -3 and 1 is -1. So this looks like it should work.
x = (a/b + c/d) / 2
x = (ad/bd + cb/bd) / 2
x = ((ad + cb)/bd) / 2
x = (ad + cb)/2bd
But wait, we were supposed to prove that there was a rational number. Is x a rational number?
ad + cb is an integer, because the multiplication and addition of integers yields an integer.
2bd is an integer, for the same reason.
Therefore x is a rational number. FLAWLESS VICTORY!
So there's our formula.
Let's try this in an example. Let's pick a = 6, b = 7, c = 4, and d = 5.
a/b is 6/7 or 0.857142...
c/d is 4/5 or 0.8
By our formula, a number between them ought to be :
x = (ad + cb)/2bd
x = (6 x 5 + 4 x 7) / 2 x 7 x 5
x = (30+28)/70
x = 58/70 or approximately 0.8285
Tada.
I gave you the answer here, but I hope this helped you understand how such proofs should be undertaken.
2007-12-01 18:45:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Neil K 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Two Rational Numbers
2016-12-16 03:35:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Proof: For any two rational numbers, a and b, there exists a number c that is their average and is also rational and lies between the two values. The sum, difference, product and quotient of any two rational numbers are rational by definition. The sum of the two is therefore rational. Dividing the sum by 2, another rational number, therefore gives a rational result.
2016-04-07 03:05:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Assume that there exist two rational numbers, n and m, that do NOT have any rational numbers between them, where m > n. Then m + n > n+n => (m+n)/2 > (n+n)/2 => (m+n)/2 > n. Similarly, m > (m+n)/2. So, since n < (m+n)/2 < m, (m+n)/2 must be irrational. But if n = a/b and m = c/d, then: (m+n) = (da+bc)/bd and (m+n)/2 = (da+bc)/(2*bd). So (m+n)/2 is clearly irrational and our assumption must be false. Therefore, there are no such numbers m and n.
2007-12-01 18:28:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by astazangasta 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Take their average! 1/2 ((a/b) + (c/d)) is rational, and between the other two.
2007-12-01 18:28:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Curt Monash 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
so given a/b and c/d, there exists (a/b + c/d) / 2, half way between them.
so for any a, b, c and d, there exists (ad + cb)/2bd
2007-12-01 18:31:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by ivan k 5
·
0⤊
0⤋