Today it seems absurd to suggest that the United States has the right to go around attacking countries to "spread freedom".
But Imperial Washington was parroting this only a few years ago...and no one has been held accountable. Many of them are running for President, in fact.
2007-12-01 17:56:08 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Best person to answer yr Q , President George W Bush.
2007-12-01 17:58:58 · answer #1 · answered by chasen54 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I don't see how some people say yes. Even if you want to assume that no other country is involved,Israel can not invade a big country such as Iraq especially that Iraq had a strong army . And as someone mentioned,the US succeeded in invading Iraq because the Shias,who were mistreated by Saddam,didn't really want to fight the Americans. Otherwise,the US would have had many more casualties and even might have failed the invasion.
2016-05-27 05:09:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is the crime? I dont know if you remember the early 90s and the 1st gulf war, but we agreed not to invade back then when Saddam agreed to let the UN have inspections when and where they wanted to. Saddam never fully complied. We had every right to throw Saddam out of power. One less nut job leader in the world as far as Im concerned. You are right about some of the senators that are running for president did vote for the war.
2007-12-01 18:51:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Your question is inane. The Iraqis violated 18 international precedents and aided in the training of hundreds of terrorist factions. Theirs were crimes against humanity and involved the deaths of millions. Do you not understand the serious danger of these same people acquiring nuclear capabilities? You must look beyond your obvious disdain for the current administration and understand what is at stake here.
TO AJ: Just a few Al-Qaeda cells? In my native country (Africa) several dozen existed in the mid-1990s there alone. The American media truly has done its best to deceive the populus.
2007-12-01 18:50:58 · answer #4 · answered by ugandanprince 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For the same reason no one was convicted of "war crimes" & ethenic clensing except Suddam Hussein (however he spelled his name)
Are you forgetting something???
His country tried him and FOUND HIM GUILTY
Another thing- Sure USA has some idiots in the armed forces over there making the USA looking bad
but
We have some of their idiots living in USA making them look bad too!!!!!!!!!
So in other words, you defend terriorism breeding ?
You think that Freedom is a Bad ? Freedom to believe & think about whatever should not be a CHOICE?
USA does not tell their students what they have to study
They give people CHOICES.
2007-12-01 19:02:06 · answer #5 · answered by Big V 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because it was all planned out by the Pillsbury dough boy. Backing him up were the Kebler elves and the Sta Puft marshmallow guy.
Not to mention their tactical use of the Internet, which was created by Barny Rubble for the use of the military establishment. Corporations now rule the world. We will all be swimming in tomato soup in the next few decades...
Oh! I'm sorry. Was that a question or just some propaganda of your own?
2007-12-01 18:11:56 · answer #6 · answered by Robert S 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Other than irritating the extreme leftists; exactly what crime was committed when we resumed military activity following the former Iraqi governments failure to abide by the cease fire.
Please cite an American law which would forbid such an action.
2007-12-01 18:24:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
wow...you liberals really still dont get it.
because no crime exists. this was a war authorized by congress which includes many of your beloved liberal extremists such as hillary and pre flip flop edwards.
2007-12-01 22:39:49 · answer #8 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. The war was authorized by Congress....no "crime" committed.
2. Your tone about this is becoming more strident with every question you post...and it still isn't making logical sense.
3. If you are dissatified with facts, the Twilight Zone is accepting immigrants.
4. Give it up Longhair...your left wing spin isn't going to do any good.
2007-12-01 18:04:29 · answer #9 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
There is BIG money in war. And who has his little fist in a Hugh chunk of it? hummmm lets see now it will come to me I'm sure. The current oily leadership and it's friends are making huge profits from this invasion,and to prove it they went back! We could have kicked their a**'s the first time .Heck CNN took how many prisoners? But no the money started to trickle a bit so they opened season back up. The world is sick of our arrogance, and it is arrogance to think every country needs to be saved from itself. Leave them alone. If they ask for help then we'll see.Stop sending aid to every hand that's held out and worry about home. I'm not saying let the people that are survivors of disasters suffer that's different but if we stopped deciding that ours is the only way to live life we would be better off.
2007-12-01 18:28:37 · answer #10 · answered by J A 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
It hasn't reach the media yet, believe plenty of things have happen in Iraq that we don't know ab out here in u.s. my boyfriend works for the federal government is often shock of what he hears at work, about things happening in Iraq and here in us that doesnt recieved media coverage.
2007-12-01 18:16:08 · answer #11 · answered by christaglo 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋