English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-01 15:43:49 · 6 answers · asked by fastfreedombailbonds 4 in Sports Basketball

6 answers

He was a hard-playing and hard-fouling player. There are some who would call his play "dirty". Certainly today people would be screaming about his play being dirty. But he was good.

2007-12-01 17:10:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I thought he was a really good basketball player for the Pistons and an excellent head coach for the Detroit Shock and has helped the team win two WNBA championships.

2007-12-01 15:52:02 · answer #2 · answered by what's up 2 · 1 0

He could shoot 3's and throw elbows and take people out of their game. He would get his *** kicked and that's about it. He was not the major reason for the pistons winning 2 championships but he did contribute. He is a great coach in the WNBA though. gotta give the man props for that.

2007-12-01 21:47:54 · answer #3 · answered by basketball is my religion 4 · 2 0

Bill Laimbeer=motherf*cker. But like what the others said, he's a good WNBA coach.

2007-12-02 11:40:36 · answer #4 · answered by MyKill 5 · 1 0

one of twelve reasons why we now have an infraction called flagrant foul. the other eleven were his teammates. other than that, he's a good outside shooter.

2007-12-01 20:12:41 · answer #5 · answered by m33p0 5 · 2 0

He played well.

2007-12-01 15:46:02 · answer #6 · answered by Reverend Black Grape 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers